2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment and survival disparities in lung cancer: The effect of social environment and place of residence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
113
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
113
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings therefore support calls for urgent action to address socioeconomic disparity in treatment7 10 24 35 and survival of patients with lung cancer 8–11 24…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings therefore support calls for urgent action to address socioeconomic disparity in treatment7 10 24 35 and survival of patients with lung cancer 8–11 24…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…There is mixed evidence of urban–rural survival differences in the literature 7–9 11 15–19. While it did not show a statistically significant relationship between area of residence of survival for all cases, a study in the US state of Georgia found that among early-stage patients with non-small cell lung cancer, those in rural areas had a higher survival rate than urban patients 7. A study in Denmark found that those in peripheral rural areas, which was the most remote category, had higher survival than those in urban areas or rural areas 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Communities with economic and political resources are better equipped to influence zoning regulations, ensure employment and educational opportunities, and make successful attempts to avoid noxious facilities (14,53) Few studies have examined the association of area-level characteristics with the receipt of treatment or survival for NSCLC patients in the United States. In an earlier study (22) of all NSCLC patients (all stages) we found educational attainment and economic deprivation were associated with receipt of surgery and survival outcomes. Our current study suggests similar associations; although, the characteristics that were meaningful differed for black and white patients.…”
Section: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5) May 2016mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…17). Although the negative effects of lower SES on NSCLC treatment and survival have been widely studied (18)(19)(20)(21)(22), the impact of residential segregation on prognosis and the utilization of cancer care have yet to be determined. The only study to date investigating the relationship between segregation and lung cancer found black and Hispanic patients living in highly segregated areas had lower odds of early-stage diagnosis compared with white patients (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%