2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traveling waves in the nonlocal KPP-Fisher equation: Different roles of the right and the left interactions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in Subsection 2.2, we state a somewhat weaker version of Theorem 1.4, Theorem 2.5. This result does not require any sub-tangency restriction from g. In Subsection 2.3, we are also illustrating our findings on an explicit example allowing a rather complete analytical and numerical analysis (this type of 'toy models' was proposed in [26], see also [10,17]). In particular, the computations done in Subsection 2.3 suggest that c = c(τ ) is decreasing function of τ and that each monotone wavefront is unique (up to a translation).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, in Subsection 2.2, we state a somewhat weaker version of Theorem 1.4, Theorem 2.5. This result does not require any sub-tangency restriction from g. In Subsection 2.3, we are also illustrating our findings on an explicit example allowing a rather complete analytical and numerical analysis (this type of 'toy models' was proposed in [26], see also [10,17]). In particular, the computations done in Subsection 2.3 suggest that c = c(τ ) is decreasing function of τ and that each monotone wavefront is unique (up to a translation).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Broadly speaking, the cited works show that the wave uniqueness can be established when either the evolution equation or the waves are monotone, or when the Lipschitz constant of nonlinear reaction term is dominated by its derivative at the unstable equilibrium (the Diekmann-Kaper condition). On the other hand, recent studies [8,17,25] reveal that the uniqueness property can fail to hold even for monotone waves of some non-local monostable equations. To get a clearer picture of the situation, consider the following KPP-Fisher delayed equation (see [2,10,14,15,17,18,19,20,32] for more detail and references concerning this model):…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if h ≥ 0.57 then all non-constant positive wave solutions to (1) are slowly oscillating in the space variable, see [10,18]. In this situation, neither the comparison techniques nor the Berestycki-Nirenberg sliding solutions method, nor the Diekmann-Kaper approach can be used to prove the uniqueness of all traveling waves to (1) (the property conjectured in [17]). Thus only partial waves' uniqueness results for the Hutchinson diffusive equation (1) were available so far.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to stress that the above uniqueness result is valid only within the sub-class of monotone wavefronts. As it was shown in [17], the uniqueness property does not hold within the larger class of all wavefronts even for the nonlocal 2 KPP-Fisher equation (i.e. when γ = 0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%