2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple approach to the wave uniqueness problem

Abstract: We propose a new approach for proving uniqueness of semi-wavefronts in generally nonmonotone monostable reaction-diffusion equations with distributed delay. This allows to solve an open problem concerning the uniqueness of non-monotone (hence, slowly oscillating) semi-wavefronts to the KPP-Fisher equation with delay. Similarly, a broad family of the Mackey-Glass type diffusive equations is shown to possess a unique (up to translation) semi-wavefront for each admissible speed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, we will distinguish between two following situations. In every case, (25) holds with ρ = min{ρ 1 , ρ 2 }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, we will distinguish between two following situations. In every case, (25) holds with ρ = min{ρ 1 , ρ 2 }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, φ(t) has no more than exponential rate of decay at −∞, cf. [25,Lemma 6]. Again, an application of [26,Lemma 22] shows that y(t) = v 0 (t)(1 + o(1)), t → +∞, where v 0 (t) is a non-zero eigensolution of the equation v (t) − cv (t) + v(t) = 0 corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues z 1 , z 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that equation (3) with b = 0 coincides with the usual KPP-Fisher delayed equation, cf. [1,2,3,4,5,6,11,18,27]. There are at least four distinct demonstrations of the wavefront existence criterion for this equation (see [4,5,6,11]): our proof here differs from the previously known ones.…”
Section: Revisiting Non-standard Quasi-monotonicity Approach To the Wmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The proof of (B) is based on standard arguments from complex analysis (e.g. see [18,Appendix]) and it is omitted.…”
Section: Revisiting Non-standard Quasi-monotonicity Approach To the Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation