Travel risk perceptions, travel intentions and influencing factors: A natural disaster context

Abstract

While studies of tourist risk perceptions and travel intentions have focused on terrorism, political instability, and outbreak diseases, limited studies have focused on natural disasters, despite the increased impact of disasters. Such events not only cause physical devastation to a tourist destination, but can affect future travel to the effected destination. Natural disasters can create risks for potential tourists which may influence their travel intentions. Thus understanding these risks and how they influence travel intentions is vital.To date, while abundant research is attempting to understand the effect of disasters on risk perceptions, and its subsequent impact on travel intention, questions remain unanswered.Conceptually research should be conducted using a bottom up approach to understand risk perceptions and the factors which can influence risk perceptions. Researchers agree that risk is a multidimensional construct that is context specific, thus more research is needed in the context of natural disasters rather than relying on studies that have explored other types of risks that may not be relevant. In addition, the domestic tourist as a market has been ignored in past studies, which tend to focus on international tourists. In order to address these gaps, this thesis develops a holistic understanding of risk perceptions and the factors that affect the travel intentions of domestic tourists in a destination vulnerable to natural disasters. Accordingly, there are three research objectives in this thesis. First, a bottom up approach is used to identify disaster specific risk dimensions. Second, to understand the relationships between the dimensions of travel risks, the factors that influence travel risk perception and travel intention. Third, to investigate how the dimensions of risk, and the factors that influence risk perception affect the travel intention of domestic tourists to destinations prone to natural disasters. Hence, a mixed method sequential method approach was applied.Initially 52 respondents completed a semi-structure interview. The results were then verified by 605 respondents in a mall intercept survey. The study area was West Sumatra, Indonesia which is one of the most disaster prone destinations in the world, yet it is also considered one of top ten domestic tourist destinations in Indonesia. The thematic analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and Partial least square -Structural equation modelling helped to untangle the complex interrelationships between the risk dimensions, travel intentions and influencing factors.iii Firstly, this thesis uncovered seven dimensions of travel risk in the context of natural disasters. They consist of government preparedness, helplessness, tsunami, feeling trapped, earthquake anxiety, mitigation awareness and mythical beliefs. Many of these risks are consistent with risks found in other context; however two risks (mitigation awareness and mythical beliefs) were also identified. This finding suggests that risk perceptions are context specific ...

Post COVID-19 Pandemic International Travel: Does Risk Perception and Stress-Level Affect Future Travel Intention?

“…In the economic field, the concept of risk was introduced in the 1920s where a decision-making study was under economic and financial areas (Hashim et al, 2018). Bauer (1960) was the first to identify risk perception in the context of consumer behavior within the marketing discipline (Lenggogeni, 2015). Then, the idea of risk has become a standard inventory of consumer behavior literature (Pike & Ryan, 2004).…”

“…He emphasized that risk perception plays a certain role in raising the awareness of tourists on the consequences of loss. Meanwhile, Lenggogeni (2015) classified the dimensions into four different sets: time loss, hazard loss, money loss, and ego loss. Then, another study, Kaplan et al (1974) proposed five dimensions of risk perception including performance, financial, psychological, physical and social.…”

“…The dimensions include crime risk, disease risk, natural disasters, unhygienic, transportation, and culture or language barriers (Hasan et al, 2017). However, Lenggogeni (2015) argued that there is no model, which can be extensively used to investigate individuals' perceived travel risks. Finally, Brooker (1984) combined the time loss dimension of Roselius (1971) and all the five dimensions proposed by Kaplan et al (1974); it includes social risk, financial risk, physical risk, psychological risk, performance risk and time risk (Lenggogeni, 2015).…”

Were They Happy? Emotion of Tourists with Health Problem Emotions When Planning a Trip Disaster Prone Destinations

“…Although health and disaster most likely to sharpen tourist's travel risks for vulnerable traveler [3,28,29], our study reveal that travelling was identified as an activity that stimulate the positive emotions and support to improve traveller's mental health issue. This show that travelling shape tourist's positive emotion such as in a short vacation [20,30].…”

Why Is The Partial Least Square Important For Tourism Studies

“…Most tourism studies are exploratory-based research papers in nature (i.e., Devianto, Ridho, Maryati, & Lenggogeni, 2019;Filimonau & Mika, 2019;Mason, Augustyn, & Seakhoa-King, 2010;Nunkoo & Ramkissoon, 2011). There are many development research theories, such as a new scale development in tourism study (for instance, Lenggogeni, Ritchie, & Slaughter, 2019), which is often applied in the complex multiple regression-based research framework (Lenggogeni, 2015;Lenggogeni & Saito, 2018).…”