Traumatic Evisceration and Incarceration of Small Bowel Through Vaginal Cuff

Ferenczy, J; Ayoub, Macram M.; Nemec, Hannah M

doi:10.1177/0003134820943557

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Management1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Though there is no consensus on the most optimal route of repair, minimally invasive approaches (vaginal, laparoscopic, or combination) have become the predominant method of management in recent literature, with laparotomy reserved for patients with hemodynamic instability or necrotic bowel [1,2,11,37,38,[41][42][43][44][45].…”

Section: Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevention and management of vaginal cuff dehiscence: an updated review

Pinho

Liu

Kim

et al. 2022

Current Opinion in Obstetrics &Amp; Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of reviewMinimally invasive hysterectomy has gained popularity because of its many benefits. However, laparoscopic and robotic assisted hysterectomy have been associated with increased risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence. This review is meant to address risk management and prevention of vaginal cuff dehiscence in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy. Recent findingsRecent findings in the literature focus on addressing modifiable risk factors in patients and on using good surgical technique to help minimize the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence.

show abstract