2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic brain injury in pedestrian–vehicle collisions: Convexity and suitability of some functionals used as injury metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in the Appendix A it is justified that, for , it is also a convex function, under some reasonable assumptions. All these properties make BVDM a mathematically suitable metric in the sense of [ 15 ]. As for the suitability of RMDM, it was previously discussed in the same reference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, in the Appendix A it is justified that, for , it is also a convex function, under some reasonable assumptions. All these properties make BVDM a mathematically suitable metric in the sense of [ 15 ]. As for the suitability of RMDM, it was previously discussed in the same reference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are some mathematical properties that make a metric suitable, which we will examine for the three metrics. As a mathematical functional, the suitable properties of an injury metric are scalability, continuity and convexity [ 15 ] (see Appendix A ). Scalability and continuity are intuitive, while convexity is required for the existence of an acceleration curve which minimizes the damage under specific conditions and, therefore, the value of the injury metric.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to nonlinear stress–strain response, it is interesting to note that some widely used computational models, such as early versions of SIMon, created by NHTSA, modeled CBVs as linear elastic cables rather than as cables with a nonlinear elastic response [ 39 , 40 ]. This would have a direct bearing on the estimation made in the injury metric called relative motion damage measure (RMDM) [ 41 ] used to predict the probability of SDH due to mechanical failure of some CBV [ 42 , 43 ]. Similarly, other human head computational models, among which are the UDS FEHM (Université de Strasbourg) [ 44 ], the KTH FEHM (S. Kleiven) [ 45 ], the UCDBTM (University College Dublin) [ 46 , 47 ], the WSUBIM (Wayne State University) [ 48 ], or the G/LHM [ 49 ], also model CBVs as elastic beams with a linear stress–strain response [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of injury metrics used to assess restraint systems in vehicles or the design of other preventive elements against head trauma. Currently, the estimation is often done by the injury metric called "relative motion damage measure" (RMDM) [40,41], used to predict the probability of a SDH due to the failure of PSBVs [42,43]. However, that metric was developed based on obsolete data [26], and the data from this study can be used to update that injury metric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%