2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007804119319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in international relief and development personnel

Abstract: International relief and development personnel may be directly or indirectly exposed to traumatic events that put them at risk for developing symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In order to identify areas of risk and related reactions; surveys were administered to 113 recently returned staff from 5 humanitarian aid agencies. Respondents reporred high rates of direct and indirect exposure to life-threatening events. Approximately 30% of those surveyed reported significant symptoms of PTSD. Multipl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
123
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
123
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each item is a word or phrase that is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem), reflecting the extent to which the particular symptom was a problem for the respondent during the past one month. The LASC is a widely used PTSD evaluating instrument (e.g., Eriksson, Kemp, Gorsuch, Hoke, & Foy, 2001;Scott, 2007;Stander, Merrill, Thomsen, & Milner, 2007), and reliability and validity of this scale have been well documented (Orsillo, 2001). The Chinese version of the Los Angeles Symptom Checklist was adapted by a two-stage process of translation and reverse translation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is a word or phrase that is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem), reflecting the extent to which the particular symptom was a problem for the respondent during the past one month. The LASC is a widely used PTSD evaluating instrument (e.g., Eriksson, Kemp, Gorsuch, Hoke, & Foy, 2001;Scott, 2007;Stander, Merrill, Thomsen, & Milner, 2007), and reliability and validity of this scale have been well documented (Orsillo, 2001). The Chinese version of the Los Angeles Symptom Checklist was adapted by a two-stage process of translation and reverse translation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of PTSD among military and police personnel have found prevalence estimates of 8.3% (Defence Health 2016) and 10-12% (Rose et al 2002) for these populations respectively, compared with 4-6% of the general population (Cooper et al 2014). Whilst studies of HA workers have generally relied on questionnaire measures rather than structured clinical interviews (producing estimates of "probable PTSD" rather than formal diagnoses), indicative rate estimates for PTSD among national and international expatriate HA workers range between 17 and 30% in the available literature (Eriksson et al 2001;Armagan et al 2006;Putman et al 2009;Zhen et al 2012). …”
Section: Mental Health Comparisons Between Humanitarian Aid and Emergmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there has been preliminary evidence that sense of coherence [26] and attachment style [27] are important predictors of secondary traumatization. Other studies showed that social support plays a decisive role in recovery after direct and indirect traumatization [11,17,28] . As is evident from recent literature focusing on primary traumatization [29] , a present sense of coherence seems to be protective for the development of secondary traumatization symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%