2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapped annular pressure caused by thermal expansion in oil and gas wells: A review of prediction approaches, risk assessment and mitigation strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former two methods are most reliable mitigation technologies because the foam and nitrogen have much better compressibility. 1 Insulating tubing and casing and insulating packer fluid are another two reliable methods to avoid APB induced by annular temperature mitigation. The deficiency of nitrogen shrinking spacer is complex technology and expensive devices.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pressure Relief Effect With Other Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The former two methods are most reliable mitigation technologies because the foam and nitrogen have much better compressibility. 1 Insulating tubing and casing and insulating packer fluid are another two reliable methods to avoid APB induced by annular temperature mitigation. The deficiency of nitrogen shrinking spacer is complex technology and expensive devices.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pressure Relief Effect With Other Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Compared to the land exploration, the working condition of deepwater HTHP wells is more strict and complicated with high risk and cost. However, high temperature and high pressure (HTHP) is a common problem in exploration of offshore oil and gas resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations