2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Transverse Action” – A model benchmark exercise for numerical analysis of the Callovo-Oxfordian claystone hydromechanical response to excavation operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergences were also monitored in a number of measurement sections. A detailed account of the instrumentation at the GCS is given in Seyedi et al (2017).…”
Section: The Gcs Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Convergences were also monitored in a number of measurement sections. A detailed account of the instrumentation at the GCS is given in Seyedi et al (2017).…”
Section: The Gcs Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several characteristics of the FE simulation presented here correspond to the specification of the Transverse Action benchmark (Seyedi et al, 2017). The two main simplifying assumptions in the present analysis are the adoption of plane strain conditions and neglecting the gravity gradient.…”
Section: Main Features Of the Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in situ principal stresses, at 490 m depth, are estimated to be σ v = 12.7 MPa in the vertical direction, σ h = 12.4 MPa in a horizontal direction, corresponding to the minor principal direction, and σ H = 16.1 MPa in the orthogonal horizontal direction, corresponding to the major principal stress (Seyedi et al, 2016). Figure 11 shows two cases of gallery orientation with respect to principal stress directions.…”
Section: Solved Initial Boundary Value Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the framework of computational homogenization provides a computationally efficient scale transition and has allowed the application of the FE 2 method for hydromechanical coupling on (semi-) engineering problems. This paper presents the application of the FE 2 model for hydromechanical coupling on the simulation of gallery excavations as part of the "Transverse action" benchmark by Andra (Seyedi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%