2005
DOI: 10.5334/2005-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposing MISA Learning Scenarios into IMS Units of Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of pattern based, COLLAGE 28 is a collaborative learning design authoring tool based on patterns called Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns (CLFPs) 29 that include a set of best practices, while CHOCOLATO 30 is an authoring tool guided by different pedagogical models that uses an ontology. Some graphical representation tools are MOT 31, LAMS 32, 33, ASK‐LDT 34, eLiveSuite 35, or UML based frameworks like the described in Ref. 36.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of pattern based, COLLAGE 28 is a collaborative learning design authoring tool based on patterns called Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns (CLFPs) 29 that include a set of best practices, while CHOCOLATO 30 is an authoring tool guided by different pedagogical models that uses an ontology. Some graphical representation tools are MOT 31, LAMS 32, 33, ASK‐LDT 34, eLiveSuite 35, or UML based frameworks like the described in Ref. 36.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benefits reflect a trade-off between constrained design options, and good reuse and particularization of CLFPs and an easy edition of collaborative LDs. These characteristics are not considered in more generic approaches, such as RELOAD LD editor (University of Bolton, 2004;Milligan, Beauvoir, & Sharples, 2005) and CopperAuthor (van der Vegt, 2005), which are close to the technical source of the specification and use text-based notation, or MOT+ (de la Teja, Lundgren-Cayro, & Paquette, 2005; see also Chapter 2.3) and ASK-LDT (Sampson, Karampiperis, & Zervas, 2005), which use graphical notations but do not incorporate abstractions easier to understand by teachers. The main features of Collage are illustrated in the following example drawn from a real case study.…”
Section: Collage a Clfp-based Ims Ld Editor Of Cscl Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cit., p.18). Moreover, an exercise in transposition, by an expert researcher, of a MISA compliant instructional scenario into an IMS LD Unit of Learning (De la Teja, 2005) provided new evidence and supported pursuit of the research. This study showed that "MISA is an ID method compatible with the IMSLD specification, because they share a lot of common conceptual elements permitting a harmonious binding" (ibid.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%