2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(01)00114-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposed saphenous vein arteriovenous fistula revisited: new technology for an old idea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] Transposed great saphenous vein merits a reevaluation and new technology as endoscopic harvesting of the vein may improve the results. 20 Femoral vein transposition, first used by Bourquelot et al 21 and first reported by Huber et al, 22 either in a straight configuration from the distal superficial femoral artery or as a loop from the common femoral artery, has been proved the most durable lower limb access procedure, with low infection rates and excellent primary patency rates ranging from 74% up to 87% at 2 years in series with 10 or more patients (Table 1). 21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] However, femoral vein transposition is a major undertaking associated with an increased risk of steal and subsequent severe limb ischemia and, additionally, is not a good option for obese patients or those with established peripheral arterial disease.…”
Section: Alternative Autogenous Lower Extremity Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] Transposed great saphenous vein merits a reevaluation and new technology as endoscopic harvesting of the vein may improve the results. 20 Femoral vein transposition, first used by Bourquelot et al 21 and first reported by Huber et al, 22 either in a straight configuration from the distal superficial femoral artery or as a loop from the common femoral artery, has been proved the most durable lower limb access procedure, with low infection rates and excellent primary patency rates ranging from 74% up to 87% at 2 years in series with 10 or more patients (Table 1). 21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] However, femoral vein transposition is a major undertaking associated with an increased risk of steal and subsequent severe limb ischemia and, additionally, is not a good option for obese patients or those with established peripheral arterial disease.…”
Section: Alternative Autogenous Lower Extremity Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saphenous vein loop transposition has not been favored because of poor reported results in patency and functionality and a very high rate of serious complications (2345). There are only a few published series about straight saphenous vein transpositions to the distal femoral or proximal popliteal arteries (6–789).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used open surgical mobilization of the vein through 3-4 separate incisions with no hemorrhagic or infective complications. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvest has been advocated to reduce surgical incision trauma and may play a role in creation of this type of AVF (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified form of the original technique is described by SantiagoDelpin et al by anastomosing the harvested saphenous vein to one of the minor branches of the femoral artery like the lateral femoral circumflex artery to prevent potential problems of high flow fistula and atherosclerotic femoral artery [13]. Recently some authors have used endoscopic vein harvesting for lowering the morbidity rates [14]. The results of this study show that the function criteria of the GSV and PTFE groups are the same and an acceptable number of the patients in the GSV group have a usable venous access at the end of a year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%