DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM Purpose of these guidelinesThe Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery charged a writing committee with the task of updating practice guidelines, initally published in 2003, for surgeons and physicians who are involved in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative care of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). 1 This document provides recommendations for evaluating the patient, including risk of aneurysm rupture and associated medical co-morbidities, guidelines for selecting surgical or endovascular intervention, intraoperative strategies, perioperative care, long-term follow-up, and treatment of late complications.Decision making related to the care of patients with AAA is complex. Aneurysms present with varying risks of rupture and patient specific factors influence anticipated life expectancy, operative risk, and the need to intervene. Careful attention to the choice of operative strategy, as influenced by anatomic features of the AAA, along with optimal treatment of medical co-morbidities is critical to achieving excellent outcomes. Moreover, appropriate postoperative patient surveillance and timely intervention in the case of a late complication is necessary to minimize subsequent aneurysm-related death or morbidity. All of these clinical decisions are determined in an environment where cost-effectiveness will ultimately dictate the ability to provide optimal care to the largest possible segment of the population. Currently available clinical data sets have been reviewed in formulating these recommendations. However, an important goal of this document is to clearly identify those areas where further clinical research is necessary. Methodology and evidenceA comprehensive review of the available clinical evidence in the literature was conducted in order to generate a concise set of recommendations. The strength of any given recommendation and the quality of evidence was scored based on the GRADE system (Table I). 2 When the benefits of an intervention outweighed its risks, or, alternatively, risks outweighed benefits, a strong recommendation was noted. However, if benefits and risks were less certain, either because of low quality evidence or because high quality evidence suggests benefits and risks are closely balanced, a weak recommendation was recorded. The quality of evidence that formed the basis of these recommendations was scored as high, moderate, or low. Not all randomized controlled trials are alike and limitations may compromise the quality of their evidence. In addition, if there is a large magnitude of effect, the quality of evidence derived from observational studies may be high. Thus, quality of evidence was scored as high when additional research is considered very unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate when further research is likely to have an important impact in the estimate of effect; or low when further research is very likely to change the estimate of the effect.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome progressing to the point of axilosubclavian vein thrombosis, variously referred to as Paget-Schroetter syndrome or effort thrombosis, is a classic example of an entity which if treated correctly has minimal long-term sequelae but if ignored is associated with significant long-term morbidity. The subclavian vein is highly vulnerable to injury as it passes by the junction of the first rib and clavicle in the anterior-most part of the thoracic outlet. In addition to extrinsic compression, repetitive forces in this area frequently lead to fixed intrinsic damage and extrinsic scar tissue formation. Once primary thrombosis is recognized, catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy is usually successful if initiated within ten to 14 days of clot formation, but often unmasks an underlying lesion. The vast majority of investigators believe that decompression of the venous thoracic outlet, usually by means of first rib excision, partial anterior scalenectomy, resection of the costoclavicular ligament, and thorough external venolysis, is necessary, although opinion is less uniform as to the need for and method of treatment of the venous lesion itself. Using this algorithm, long-term success rates of 95 to 100% have been reported by many investigators. This review, in addition to discussing the overall treatment algorithm in more detail, attempts to point out controversies that still exist and research directions, both clinical and basic, that need to be pursued. Prospective randomized trials addressing this entity are surprisingly lacking, and although there is consensus based on experience, it may be necessary to step back and rigorously explore several aspects of this entity.

Inflammation and oxidative stress are pathogenic mediators of many diseases, but therapeutic targets remain elusive. In the vasculature, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) formation critically involves inflammaton and matrix degradation. Cyclophilin A (CyPA, encoded by Ppia) is highly expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), is secreted in response to reactive oxygen species (ROS), and promotes inflammation. Using the angiotensin II (AngII)-induced AAA model in Apoe−/− mice, we show that Apoe−/−Ppia−/− mice were completely protected from AngII–induced AAA formation, in contrast to Apoe−/−Ppia+/+ mice. Apoe−/−Ppia−/− mice showed decreased inflammatory cytokine expression, elastic lamina degradation, and aortic expansion. These features were not altered by reconstitution of bone marrow cells from Ppia+/+ mice. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that VSMC-derived intracellular and extracellular CyPA were required for ROS generation and matrix metalloproteinase-2 activation. These data define a novel role for CyPA in AAA formation and suggest CyPA is a new target for cardiovascular therapies.

DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM Purpose of these guidelinesThe Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery charged a writing committee with the task of updating practice guidelines, initally published in 2003, for surgeons and physicians who are involved in the preoperative, operative, and postoperative care of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). 1 This article is an executive summary of the main practice guidelines document and provides recommendations for evaluating the patient, including risk of aneurysm rupture and associated medical co-morbidities, guidelines for selecting surgical or endovascular intervention, intraoperative strategies, perioperative care, longterm follow-up, and treatment of late complications. 2 Decision making related to the care of patients with AAA is complex. Aneurysms present with varying risks of rupture, and patient-specific factors influence anticipated life expectancy, operative risk, and the need to intervene. Careful attention to the choice of operative strategy, as influenced by anatomic features of the AAA, along with optimal treatment of medical co-morbidities is critical to achieving excellent outcomes. Moreover, appropriate postoperative patient surveillance and timely intervention in the case of a late complication is necessary to minimize subsequent aneurysm-related death or morbidity. All of these clinical decisions are determined in an environment where cost-effectiveness will ultimately dictate the ability to provide optimal care to the largest possible segment of the population. Currently available clinical data sets have been reviewed in formulating these recommendations. However, an important goal of this document is to clearly identify those areas where further clinical research is necessary. Methodology and evidenceA comprehensive review of the available clinical evidence in the literature was conducted in order to generate a concise set of recommendations. The strength of any given recommendation and the quality of evidence was scored based on the GRADE system (Table). 3 When the benefits of an intervention outweighed its risks, or, alternatively, risks outweighed benefits, a strong recommendation was noted. However, if benefits and risks were less certain, either because of low quality evidence or because high quality evidence suggests benefits and risks are closely balanced, a weak recommendation was recorded. The quality of evidence that formed the basis of these recommendations was scored as high, moderate, or low. Not all randomized controlled trials are alike and limitations may compromise the quality of their evidence. In addition, if there is a large magnitude of effect, the quality of evidence derived from observational studies may be high. Thus, quality of evidence was scored as high when additional research is considered very unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate when further research is likely to have an important impact on in the

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of disorders all having in common compression at the thoracic outlet. Three structures are at risk: the brachial plexus, the subclavian vein, and the subclavian artery, producing neurogenic (NTOS), venous (VTOS), and arterial (ATOS) thoracic outlet syndromes, respectively. Each of these three are separate entities, though they can coexist and possibly overlap. The treatment of NTOS, in particular, has been hampered by lack of data, which in turn is the result of inconsistent definitions and diagnosis, uncertainty with regard to treatment options, and lack of consistent outcome measures. The Committee has defined NTOS as being present when three of the following four criteria are present: signs and symptoms of pathology occurring at the thoracic outlet (pain and/or tenderness), signs and symptoms of nerve compression (distal neurologic changes, often worse with arms overhead or dangling), absence of other pathology potentially explaining the symptoms, and a positive response to a properly performed scalene muscle test injection. Reporting standards for workup, treatment, and assessment of results are presented, as are reporting standards for all phases of VTOS and ATOS. The overall goal is to produce consistency in diagnosis, description of treatment, and assessment of results, in turn then allowing more valuable data to be presented.

PTA and stenting of the SFA can be performed safely with excellent procedural success rates. Improved patency of these interventions was seen with increased ankle/brachial index and the performance of angioplasty only. Worse patency was seen with TASC C and TASC D lesions. Patency rates were strongly dependent on lesion type, and the results of angioplasty and stenting compared favorably with surgical bypass for TASC A and B lesions.

Intracranial hemorrhage occurs with notable frequency after carotid endarterectomy and accounts for a significant proportion of neurologic morbidity and mortality. Younger patients, hypertensive patients, and patients with severe cerebrovascular occlusive disease appear to be at greatest risk for the complication.

One third of all patients who survive AAA repair experience significant dilatation of their proximal aortic cuff over time. Proximal dilatation is rare but not absent in patients who have smaller initial aortic cuff diameters. This dilatation rarely causes problems after conventional suture fixation, but the long-term implications of cuff dilatation after endoluminal repair are unclear. Our findings suggest that endovascular aortic prostheses that have the ability to continue to self-expand many years after implantation may be required and that endovascular prostheses may not be the best option for patients who have a long life expectancy or for those who have preoperative proximal cuffs greater than 27 mm.