2019
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposable elements contribute to dynamic genome content in maize

Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitous components of eukaryotic genomes and can create variation in genome organization and content. Most maize genomes are composed of TEs. We developed an approach to define shared and variable TE insertions across genome assemblies and applied this method to four maize genomes (B73, W22, Mo17 and PH207) with uniform structural annotations of TEs. Among these genomes we identified approximately 400 000 TEs that are polymorphic, encompassing 1.6 Gb of variable TE sequence. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
10
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that lineage-specific transposable elements are more enriched in gene-rich regions towards the distal ends of the chromosomes, a genome environment that is usually lower in (fl-) TEs, and the observation that TE presence in the surrounding of genes frequently interferes with expression and functionality [27] thus allows to speculate that in part the lineage-specific TEs located in gene-rich regions might underlie functional and trait differences. Our results complement a similar recent comparison on the mobile genome content of four maize lines [28] and highlight the enormous dynamics of TE generation and purging which are already visible within the -in evolutionary time dimensions -very narrow time window after domestication and during the breeding process of maize and the spread along the Americas and towards Europe.…”
Section: The Full-length Retrotransposon Landscape Illustrates the Dysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The observation that lineage-specific transposable elements are more enriched in gene-rich regions towards the distal ends of the chromosomes, a genome environment that is usually lower in (fl-) TEs, and the observation that TE presence in the surrounding of genes frequently interferes with expression and functionality [27] thus allows to speculate that in part the lineage-specific TEs located in gene-rich regions might underlie functional and trait differences. Our results complement a similar recent comparison on the mobile genome content of four maize lines [28] and highlight the enormous dynamics of TE generation and purging which are already visible within the -in evolutionary time dimensions -very narrow time window after domestication and during the breeding process of maize and the spread along the Americas and towards Europe.…”
Section: The Full-length Retrotransposon Landscape Illustrates the Dysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Processing the assemblies through the PHG pipeline allows us to identify homologous haplotypes among the included assemblies for most defined reference ranges. Previous analyses of variation in intergenic (Anderson et al, 2019) and genic regions (Sun et al, 2018) show a relatively similar pattern to the results observed in this maize PHG database, having regions essentially shared at ~80% rate, with a relatively small subset of them being mostly missing in the majority of taxa. This is only a first approach, as potentially a more complete gene model set, resulting in smaller reference ranges, might better reflect the presence/absence variation of more refined haplotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…More recent analyses have leveraged whole-genome assemblies, allowing a detailed view of the extent of the intraspecific changes between maize varieties. These have identified signals of gene reordering, copy number, and other structural variations (Sun et al, 2018), with some cases accounting for 1.6Gb (equivalent to ~50% of the genome of B73) of variable transposable element sequences (Anderson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al (2012) observed differences in sRNA abundance between retrotransposon families. Here, armed with an updated annotation of maize TEs Anderson et al, 2019), we observed differences in the distribution of 22-nt and 24-nt sRNA between different TE orders with 22-nt around >90% LTRs while 24-nt sRNAs have a high composition from helitron and TIR DNA transposons, far greater than the genome space these TEs occupy; 2.9% and 3.0% respectively. This hints at differences in the potential roles of sRNAs in regulating different classes of TEs in maize.…”
Section: Genomic Features That Contribute To Consistent or Variable Smentioning
confidence: 86%