Transporting Evidence-Based Parenting Programs for Child Problem Behavior (Age 3–10) Between Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gardner, Frances; Montgomery, Paul; Knerr, Wendy

doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1015134

Cited by 233 publications

(176 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

151

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Yet despite such cross-country transportation, the programme appears equally effective with ethnic minority families within these new countries. This is in keeping with a recent meta-analyses exploring applicability of parenting programmes across cultures by examining their transportability across countries, 30 which found that effect sizes were generally just as strong as in their country of origin when these programmes were taken to new countries. Moreover, Gardner et al 30 found that effect sizes did not vary with countrylevel characteristics, such as cultural values around parenting or level of child welfare provision.…”

Section: Ethnicitysupporting

confidence: 53%

“…Questions such as these about transportability of interventions across cultures and countries are of wider global importance, as countries seek to enhance child outcomes through parenting and other psychosocial interventions. 14,30,31 Ensuring that interventions are targeted appropriately A second reason for examining moderator effects is to establish for which subgroups interventions might be most efficiently targeted. In the parenting literature, there is mixed evidence and opinion about the effectiveness of interventions for children at different levels of risk for conduct disorder.…”

Section: Assessing Equity Effects Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search, appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 12/3070/04. The contractual start date was in November 2013. The final report began editorial review in February 2016 and was accepted for publication in September 2016. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. This work was produced by Gardner et al. under the terms of a comm...

show abstract

Section: Ethnicitysupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Assessing Equity Effects Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With respect to the former, although much was known about the efficacy of different strategies for the management of behavior problems (Gardner et al, 2015), there were no studies assessing parents' perception of the behavioral patterns they used for managing of children's behavior problems. Our results suggest that action-oriented management of behavior problems has a more favorable effect on family climate, that is, on the reduction these problems and on parents' emotional well-being.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These strategies are based on assumptions about the value of reinforcement, punishment, negotiation and time-out (Gardner, Montgomery & Knerr, 2015;Sanders, Kirby, Tellegen, & Day, 2014). The use of these strategies can at times be ineffective, at least in the short term, and so it is possible that this ineffectiveness generates stress.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cuestionario breve de respuesta parental ante el comportamiento disruptivo (RPCD): Perspectiva de los padres.

Cantero-García

Alonso‐Tapia

2017

AN PSICOL-SPAIN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Título: Cuestionario breve de respuesta parental ante el comportamiento disruptivo (RPCD): Perspectiva de los padres. Resumen: El objetivo de este estudio es desarrollar y validar el Cuestionario de respuesta parental ante el comportamiento disruptivo (RPCD)". Los padres pueden actuar frente a los problemas y sus repercusiones emocionales de forma proactiva, buscando cómo manejarlos positivamente, o pueden centrar su atención en la respuesta emocional que genera el comportamiento disruptivo, dejándose llevar por la misma. Para evaluar el tipo de orientación personal prevalente frente a la disrupción, orientar a los padres y valorar el efecto de la intervención se requiere un tipo de cuestionario como el que se propone. Participaron en el estudio 420 padres y sus hijos. Se estudió la validez estructural del cuestionario comparando mediante Análisis factorial confirmatorio un modelo multifactorial (cinco factores específicos) y otro multifactorial-jerárquico (5.2), la validez cruzada de ambos modelos, y la validez predictiva, analizando la relación entre la percepción de los padres y las percepciones de los hijos evaluadas mediante el "Cuestionario de clima de gestión del comportamiento percibido por los hijos". Los resultados pusieron de manifiesto que los dos modelos presentaban índices de ajuste buenos y prácticamente idénticos, y semejantes en las dos submuestras. A su vez, el análisis de correlaciones puso de manifiesto que, aunque en general la relación entre las percepciones de los padres y las de sus hijos va en la dirección esperada, esto no ocurre siempre. Palabras clave: clima familiar, problemas de conducta, parentalidad positiva.Abstract: The aim of this study is to develop and validate the questionnaire of parental response to disruptive behavior (PRDB). Parents can act proactively towards problems and their emotional repercussions, focusing on how to handle them positively, or can focus their attention on the emotional response generated by behavior problems, being overburdened by them. In order to assess the prevalent personal orientation to cope with disruption, to guide parents and to assess the effect of psychological interventions, a questionnaire such as the one proposed here is required. A total of 420 parents and their children participated in the study. The structural validity of the questionnaire was tested using confirmatory factor analysis first to compare a multifactorial model (five specific factors) with a multifactorialhierarchical model (with two second-order factors), and second, to study the cross validity of both models. The predictive validity was tested analyzing the relationship between parents' and children' perceptions of family climate. Children's perceptions were assessed with the "Questionnaire of Behavior Management Climate perceived by children." Results showed that both models had good and similar fit indices that were almost identical in the two subsamples. Besides, the correlation analysis showed that although in general the relationship between perceptions of parent...

show abstract

Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents

Featherston,

Barlow,

Song

et al. 2024

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transporting Evidence-Based Parenting Programs for Child Problem Behavior (Age 3–10) Between Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cited by 233 publications

References 54 publications

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

Cuestionario breve de respuesta parental ante el comportamiento disruptivo (RPCD): Perspectiva de los padres.

Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About