2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transportation carbon dioxide emissions by built environment and family lifecycle: Case study of the Osaka metropolitan area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results related to local travel emphasize a strong geographical trend of increased car use and emission levels farther away from the city center and in car-oriented areas, which is in line with previous research conducted in the Nordic countries and elsewhere (e.g., [7,70,71]). Of multiple urban form variables tested in models, distance to the main city center was the strongest predictor of emissions and remained significant after controlling for sociodemographic variables and attitudes, which supports the results by Naess [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results related to local travel emphasize a strong geographical trend of increased car use and emission levels farther away from the city center and in car-oriented areas, which is in line with previous research conducted in the Nordic countries and elsewhere (e.g., [7,70,71]). Of multiple urban form variables tested in models, distance to the main city center was the strongest predictor of emissions and remained significant after controlling for sociodemographic variables and attitudes, which supports the results by Naess [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast with other research [1,11,13,25,33], we calculated the CO 2 Eq emissions per unit area and per VMT in each county and per mile by facility type. The estimated results showed that the high-ZEV ownership scenarios could reduce the CO 2 Eq emissions per VMT (shown in Table 5) among all counties and the gaps in CO 2 Eq emissions per mile among six road types (shown in Figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divided the households into two groups: Households without ZEVs and with ZEVs, and modeled the following four steps (i.e., trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and time-of-day split) of the travel demand forecasting model separately for the two groups. The origin-destination [25] trip tables obtained as a result after the last step (time-of-day split) for households with ZEVs and without ZEVs were combined for the highway and transit assignment steps. This revised MSTM model output the assigned ZEV and non-ZEV volume, VMTs, and vehicle hours traveled (VHTs) for every link of the network, which were then used as inputs into the MEM for calculating CO 2 Eq emissions estimates.…”
Section: Demand Forecasting Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited studies on the urban transport energy consumption in Japan have been reported so far. Waygood et al, evaluated CO 2 emissions in the transport sector in Osaka city considering the modal share [41]. Since Yang et al pointed out the difficulty of applying the empirical studies in one country to another in this topic [26], the focus on Japanese cities would assist in the exploration of new spatial scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%