2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport, sorption and degradation of atrazine in two clay soils from Mexico: Andosol and Vertisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate constants from the SFO fitting were used, because they are available for both pesticides in both soils and because one constant covers the whole degradation period. Correlation coefficients (batch approach, r = −0.783; saturated paste approach, r = −0.813) confirm that both constants were inversely related, in agreement with other reports concerning different pesticide families, which have established an inverse relationship between pesticide adsorption and degradation in soils (Di et al, 1998;Sánchez et al, 2003;Prado et al, 2014), suggesting that the degradation rate in the soil solution is more rapid than in the sorbed phase (Guo et al, 2000). In addition, the rate constants (k 2 ) from the fitting to the DFOP model, which explain the decay herbicide behaviour of N85% in S5 and N72% in S2 (Tables 2 and 3), were also inversely correlated with sorption constants (batch approach, r = − 0.792; saturated paste approach, r = − 0.890) (ElGouzi et al, 2012) implying a further confirmation of the previous assumption.…”
Section: Non-sterile Soilssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rate constants from the SFO fitting were used, because they are available for both pesticides in both soils and because one constant covers the whole degradation period. Correlation coefficients (batch approach, r = −0.783; saturated paste approach, r = −0.813) confirm that both constants were inversely related, in agreement with other reports concerning different pesticide families, which have established an inverse relationship between pesticide adsorption and degradation in soils (Di et al, 1998;Sánchez et al, 2003;Prado et al, 2014), suggesting that the degradation rate in the soil solution is more rapid than in the sorbed phase (Guo et al, 2000). In addition, the rate constants (k 2 ) from the fitting to the DFOP model, which explain the decay herbicide behaviour of N85% in S5 and N72% in S2 (Tables 2 and 3), were also inversely correlated with sorption constants (batch approach, r = − 0.792; saturated paste approach, r = − 0.890) (ElGouzi et al, 2012) implying a further confirmation of the previous assumption.…”
Section: Non-sterile Soilssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the persistence of atrazine in the present study increased in subsurface horizons in comparison with surface soil, the half‐life of atrazine only ranged between 18 and 29 d for both soils, which are substantially smaller values than those reported in some studies , but similar to the 43 or 47 d found by Vryas et al and Sarmah et al and greater than the value reported by Prado et al .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Considering horizon A as a whole (A 0 þ A 1 ) for soils at the General Alvarado and Tres Arroyos sites, values of atrazine DT50 ranged between 13 and 17 d (Figure 2), in agreement with several published reports [29,[36][37][38], including the work of Hang et al [39] in Mollisols soils from Argentina. In contrast, several authors found DT50 values for atrazine ranging from 37 to 101 d [8,[40][41][42][43][44], whereas others obtained smaller half-life values that were attributed to the process of enhanced degradation occurring in fields with repeated annual applications of atrazine on continuous corn [10,45,46]. Although the main decomposition route of atrazine is rapid microbial breakdown through the opening of the s-triazine ring, in acid soils with high organic matter content (e.g., the A horizons in the present study; Table 1), the formation of bound residues is an important abiotic attenuation process.…”
Section: Persistence Of Acetochlor Atrazine and S-metolachlormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers explain the formation of well-known non-extractable chloro-s-triazine residues in soil by chemical binding to HA by heteroatomic bonds after the substitution of a chlorine atom (Neto et al 1994;Yu and Cole 1997;Davies and Jabeen 2003;Zupancic-Kralj, 2005, Prosen et al 2007). Many researchers have demonstrated the influence of the mineral components of soil on the sorption of atrazine (Davies and Jabeen 2003;GonzalezPradas et al 2003;Lesueur et al 2008;Feria-Reyes et al 2011;Barchanska et al 2013;Prado et al 2014). SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 are the predominant minerals present in soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%