1981
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(81)90131-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport properties of SnTe interpreted by means of a two valence band model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, lead-free SnTe is expected to become possible alternative of PbTe, because they have a similar rocksalt structure ( ) and electronic band structures. 4,5 However, the highest ZT of SnTe is found to be around 0.5, far below the values of ~ 2.0 for PbTe alloys. 6,7 SnTe possesses too high hole-carrier concentration (~ 10 21 /cm 3 ) due to intrinsic Sn vacancies, resulting in low Seebeck coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Recently, lead-free SnTe is expected to become possible alternative of PbTe, because they have a similar rocksalt structure ( ) and electronic band structures. 4,5 However, the highest ZT of SnTe is found to be around 0.5, far below the values of ~ 2.0 for PbTe alloys. 6,7 SnTe possesses too high hole-carrier concentration (~ 10 21 /cm 3 ) due to intrinsic Sn vacancies, resulting in low Seebeck coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Tin telluride (SnTe), a lead-free IV-VI narrow band-gap semiconductor has not been considered favorably as a good thermoelectric material because of its low ZT due to the relatively low Seebeck coefficient and high electronic thermal conductivity caused by intrinsic Sn vacancies (11)(12)(13), although SnTe has been used to alloy with other tellurides for better TE properties (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Even though there has been no real success in achieving good TE properties of lead-free SnTe, the similarity between the electronic band structure of SnTe and that of PbTe and PbSe (27)(28)(29)(30)(31) suggests it has the potential to be a good TE material, especially given the two valence bands (light-hole and heavy-hole bands) that contribute to the hole density of states. The main difficulty here, however, is the fact that the separation between the light-hole and heavy-hole band edges in SnTe is estimated to be in the range of ∼0.3 to ∼0.4 eV (27,29), larger than those of PbTe or PbSe (9), rendering the benefit of the heavier mass for the Seebeck coefficient less significant.…”
Section: G Ood Thermoelectric (Te) Materials Should Not Only Have Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PbTe [28][29][30] and SnTe [31][32][33][34] both have a higher-energy L and a lower-energy Σ valence band. In pristine materials with optimized carrier concentrations, the lower-energy offset between these two bands in PbTe (0.17 eV 29,30,35 at 300 K) compared with that in SnTe (0.3-0.4 eV 32,34 at 300 K) leads to a much higher-power factor (30 μW cm − 1 K − 2 36 ) for PbTe than that for SnTe (20 μW cm − 1 K − 2 37 ). For GeTe, the available literature shows a power factor of ∼ 40 μW cm − 1 K − 2 , [38][39][40][41] which is the highest among the three compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%