2002
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of mercury(II) ion through a supported liquid membrane containing a triisobutylphosphine sulfide (Cyanex 471X) as a mobile carrier

Abstract: Carrier-facilitated transport of mercury(II) against its concentration gradient from aqueous 0.1 mol dm À3 hydrochloric acid solution across a¯at-sheet supported liquid membrane (SLM) containing triisobutylphosphine sul®de (Cyanex 471X) as the mobile carrier in kerosene as diluent has been investigated. Dilute sodium thiocyanate solution (0.11 mol dm À3 ) was the most ef®cient stripping agent among several aqueous reagents tested. Various parameters such as stirring rate, concentration of HCl in the feed solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Additionally, a practically constant retention of mercury within the PIM is observed. It is also interesting to point out that the permeability values observed compare favorably to those reported for similar SLM systems employing Cyanex 471X as carrier (0.05-0.29 cm min −1 ), 23 and are higher than those reported for SLMs using benzoylthiourea derivatives (0.041-0.096 cm min −1 ) 19 and calix [4]arene nitrile derivatives (0.8 × 10 −4 to 8 × 10 −4 cm min −1 ) 17 as carriers. Transport rates are also higher than those reported for activated composite membranes (ACM) using DTPA as carrier (≈54% in strip after 180 min).…”
Section: Transport Experimentssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…27 Additionally, a practically constant retention of mercury within the PIM is observed. It is also interesting to point out that the permeability values observed compare favorably to those reported for similar SLM systems employing Cyanex 471X as carrier (0.05-0.29 cm min −1 ), 23 and are higher than those reported for SLMs using benzoylthiourea derivatives (0.041-0.096 cm min −1 ) 19 and calix [4]arene nitrile derivatives (0.8 × 10 −4 to 8 × 10 −4 cm min −1 ) 17 as carriers. Transport rates are also higher than those reported for activated composite membranes (ACM) using DTPA as carrier (≈54% in strip after 180 min).…”
Section: Transport Experimentssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Changing the nature of the strip phase using different complexing agents does not show any improvement in Hg(II) transport with respect to the 0.2 mol dm −3 NaCl phase (Table 1). In this form one advantage of the system is that it employs a nonhazardous easy-to-dispose strip solution in comparison with other membrane systems that employ thiocyanate, 15,23 thiourea, 19,20 thiourea in sulfuric acid, 37 thiosulfate, 20 iodide in sulfuric acid, 21 or EDTA. 13,16 In addition, although mercury retention is observed in the membrane with all the tested strip solutions, which is associated with a higher rate of extraction than back-extraction probably due to kinetics factors, it diminished when using the optimized strip solution.…”
Section: Influence Of the Nature Of The Stripping Phasementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[17][18][19][20][21] A limited number of reports is available on transport studies of Hg 2+ ions through the membrane. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] The development of novel membrane carrier for selective removal of mercury from an aqueous mixture is still a challenge. 28 Moreover, due to wide industrial application of mercury [29][30][31][32] the development of new transport systems for selective removal of Hg 2+ ion is of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLM has been employed for the separation of Pt ions with trioctylamine [22], LIX 26 [23] and bis(2-ethylhexyl)-phosphoric acid [24] as carriers. The transport of U ions through SLM can be facilitated by using LIX63 [25], Kelex100 [26], bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate [27], bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid [28], Cyanex 272 [28], and dicyclohexan-18-crown-6 [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%