2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparent electrode for monolithic perovskite/silicon-heterojunction two-terminal tandem solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] With the improvement in WBG perovskite cells, the efficiencies of perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells have increased from 13.7% in 2015 to 23.6% in 2017, and to 25.2% in June 2018 (Table S1). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Optical loss, fill factor loss, current mismatch, and open-circuit voltage (V oc ) deficit (E g /q À V oc ) are the main issues currently limiting the PCE of these perovskite/silicon tandem devices. Several technologies have been explored to reduce the reflection-and parasitic-absorption-induced optical losses, such as antireflective foils, 12 nanocrystalline silicon recombination junctions, 13 silicon-nanoparticle rear reflectors, 11 and double-side-textured silicon bottom cells.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] With the improvement in WBG perovskite cells, the efficiencies of perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells have increased from 13.7% in 2015 to 23.6% in 2017, and to 25.2% in June 2018 (Table S1). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Optical loss, fill factor loss, current mismatch, and open-circuit voltage (V oc ) deficit (E g /q À V oc ) are the main issues currently limiting the PCE of these perovskite/silicon tandem devices. Several technologies have been explored to reduce the reflection-and parasitic-absorption-induced optical losses, such as antireflective foils, 12 nanocrystalline silicon recombination junctions, 13 silicon-nanoparticle rear reflectors, 11 and double-side-textured silicon bottom cells.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their solution processability, bandgap tunability, and high photovoltaic performance without epitaxial growth that requires lattice matching, organicinorganic halide perovskites have distinguished themselves from other photovoltaic semiconductors as suitable tandem partners for silicon. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Recent…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish this goal, however, the subcell absorption layer must meet the requirements of low losses and appropriate bandgap. In the past few years, perovskite solar cells have been extensively explored as the top cell for the fabrication of tandem or triple‐junction solar cells . Typically, the CsPbX 3 QDs are considered as an ideal top cell candidate for multijunction solar cells, because of the tunable bandgap between 1.75 and 2.13 eV as well as the open‐circuit voltage approximately exceeding 85% of the Shockley‐Queisser limit.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Applications Of Ihpqdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a monolithic perovskite/silicon TSC, the first critical step is to replace the original opaque metal electrode with a highly transparent and conductive electrode. The most usually applied TCEs for TSCs are those formed by transparent conducting oxides (TCOs), typically ITO, IZO, AZO, hydrogenated indium oxide (IO:H) (Figure a), etc. IO:H electrodes have fairly minor parasitic absorption, while the additional annealing process at 150–200 °C may be detrimental to the perovskite underlayer .…”
Section: Optical Loss Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical limit of subcell current matching is supposed to be approximately half that of a single‐junction silicon cell (≈ 43.3 mA cm −2 ) . However, at present J SC is still limited to the range of 15–18 mA cm −2 . Bush et al have reported a monolithic perovskite/silicon heterojunction (SHJ) TSC with a total J SC of 37.4 mA cm −2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%