Transnational Regulatory Integration and Development: A New Framework for Institutional Change

Bruszt, László; McDermott, Gerald A.

doi:10.1590/s0034-759020160408

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A third and more recent development emphasises how countries react to and experiment with a growing patchwork of transnational regulatory integration (Bruszt and McDermott, 2014). Some of these regulations have encouraged buyers to reduce the number of suppliers and focus on large partners, excluding small and medium-sized producers.…”

Section: Evolving Opportunities For Intermediaries In Value Chainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses intermediary organisations in developing economy agricultural clusters. The paper critically engages with a growing narrative in studies of intermediaries that have stressed the ownership structure of intermediaries as a key driver for enabling knowledge transfer, inter-firm learning and upgrading of small producers in clusters. Two case studies of Latin American clusters are presented and discussed. The study suggests that in addition to ownership structure, cluster governance and the embeddedness of intermediaries in clusters are critical factors that need to be taken into account in understanding the influence of intermediaries in the upgrading of small producers in clusters.

show abstract

Section: Evolving Opportunities For Intermediaries In Value Chainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse

Giedraityte

2018

BJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[full article and abstract in English] This article reviews the existing academic literature that compares and explains the differences between the US and the EU’s external actions. An analytical matrix is devised to group publications by level of analysis (micro-, mid-, and macro) and by theme of comparison criteria. The key findings are that in the macro level of analysis, authors tend to compare the role actors have in international relations before claiming either that the EU is a different kind of power due to its peculiar historical experience, or that the EU is weak due to its complicated structure and lack of military capacities. Furthermore, authors conducting their analyses at the micro level tend to find more similarities between the EU and the US’s external actions than those working at the macro level. The article concludes by making a point in favour of further comparisons as an essential tool to better understand the EU and other actors in international relations.

show abstract

TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE REGIMES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH: MULTINATIONALS, STATES AND NGOs AS POLITICAL ACTORS

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transnational Regulatory Integration and Development: A New Framework for Institutional Change

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters

Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters

Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse

TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE REGIMES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH: MULTINATIONALS, STATES AND NGOs AS POLITICAL ACTORS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About