2021
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1973084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during air travel: a descriptive and modelling study

Abstract: Objectives To explore the potential of SARS-CoV-2 spread during air travel and the risk of in-flight transmission. Methods We enrolled all passengers and crew suspected of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, who bounded for Beijing on international flights. We specified the characteristics of all confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection and utilised Wells-Riley equation to estimate the infectivity of COVID-19 during air travel. Results We screened 4… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [ 64 ] used 100 quanta/h for aircraft COVID-19 infection risk analysis. However, Zhang et al [ 65 ] reported that the quantum generation rate of SARS-CoV-2 during air travel was 375 per hour. In addition, Chen et al [ 66 ] showed that the SARS-CoV-2 quantum generation rate was 185.63 per hour by estimating the virus emission rate using the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [ 64 ] used 100 quanta/h for aircraft COVID-19 infection risk analysis. However, Zhang et al [ 65 ] reported that the quantum generation rate of SARS-CoV-2 during air travel was 375 per hour. In addition, Chen et al [ 66 ] showed that the SARS-CoV-2 quantum generation rate was 185.63 per hour by estimating the virus emission rate using the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36.1% of attendants travelled by aeroplane to the conference, which has a negligible risk of transmission of infection due to proper screening and mitigation measures 14 . Breakthrough infection of COVID after the conference was 0.173% (1/576), lower than the 2.605% rate (39/1497) in a study by Bergwerk et al (which was a hospital‐based study), indicating that the risk of transmission is low when the majority of attendants are vaccinated, and safe preventive measures are followed 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6 lists the 22 studies on COVID-19 transmission and/or prevalence on airplanes. Among them, 13 studies reported in-flight transmission rates ranging from 0% to 10% with a median of 0.36% [ 7 , 12 , [77] , [78] , [79] , [80] , [81] , [82] , [83] , [84] , [85] , [86] , [87] ]. The highest transmission rate of 10% was reported on a domestic flight in Japan where 14 passengers were infected [ 87 ].…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Transmission In Public Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1.4 × 10 −6 – 1.3 × 10 −7 Pang et al, 2021 [ 84 ] 18 flights from Europe to England No NA 0.20% (17/2313) on average; Blomquist et al, 2021 [ 78 ] 3.8% within 2 rows from index person Milan, Italy – South Korea N95 face mask An 11-h evacuation flight carried 299 passengers. 0.30% (one possible in-flight transmission, potentially via the toilet) Bae et al, 2020 [ 77 ] 830 international flights arriving in Beijing Face mask 161 COVID-19 cases confirmed 94 flights, of which, in-flight transmission observed on 2 flights 0.36% (flight 1); Zhang et al, 2021 [ 85 ] 0.42% (flight 2) Wuhan – other cities, China NA 175 COVID-19 index cases among 5797 passengers on 177 flights during Jan. 4–23, 2020 0.33%–0.60% (overall); Hu et al, 2021 [ 12 ] 0.7% (the middle seat); 9.2% (adjacent to the index case) Boston, USA–Hong Kong, China NA A 15-h flight carried 294 passengers. 1.4% (4/294) Choi et al, 2020 [ 79 ] Dubai, UAE - Auckland, New Zealand Face mask not mandatory An 18-h flight carried 86 passengers.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Transmission In Public Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%