“…However, initially, it did not draw much attention, mostly due to the high level of parasitic losses (∼2% per cm) observed in Cr:LiCAF during the early years of its production (for Cr:LiSAF passive losses have been around ∼0.2% per cm) [34][35][36][37][38]. This high level of passive losses in Cr:LiCAF rooted mostly from micrometer-sized or smaller precipitates arising during the growth process [35,36], which obstructed efficient laser operation in this low-gain medium. On the other hand, compared to Cr:LiSAF, Cr:LiCAF has several advantages, including a higher intrinsic slope efficiency [39], a higher thermal conductivity [39], a higher thermal quenching temperature [40], a lower thermal lensing [41], a lower quantum defect, a lower excited-state absorption [9,10], and a lower upconversion rate [42].…”