Abstract:In 2020, an unexpectedly large outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic was reported in mainland China. As we known, the epidemic was caused by imported cases in other provinces of China except for Hubei in 2020. In this paper, we developed a differential equation model with tracing isolation strategy with close contacts of newly confirmed cases and discrete time imported cases, to perform assessment and risk analysis for COVID-19 outbreaks in Tianjin and Chongqing city. Firstly, the model … Show more
“…This pattern of the effective reproduction number identified with our approach is similar to the one computed using dynamical system model 33 . The maintenance of the effective reproduction number below 1 observed in our study due to the policies that control imported cases is consistent with the estimated low reproduction number in other places where inter-cities travel restrictions were imposed 36 , 39 , 41 . Despite a continuous flow of cases from India, one of the most COVID-19 affected countries in the world, the policies implemented by the Nepal government ideally controlled the local transmission, and thus deserve in-depth analysis to identify their local level impacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 ). In line with our finding, the disparity in -trend has also been found in two cities of China where imported cases also contributed to the COVID-19 cases at the beginning of the epidemic 36 . Such wide disparities across provinces found by our study underscores that the analysis of country-level data might not be enough to implement policies for reducing province-level epidemic indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to the number and type of policies, the magnitude of effects of these policies is quite different from province to province (Table 4 ). In general, lockdown appeared to be the most effective policy to control most of the indicators, consistent with previous studies 33 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 43 , although there were some exceptions. Combining all these analyses, our results indicate that the net effect of the policies can be province-dependent despite the policy planning at national level, and thus province-level analysis is critical to proper implementation of government policies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Table 2 , we present the values of basic reproduction number along with their 95% confidence intervals for Nepal and its provinces. We estimated the basic reproduction number for the whole country to be 1.083 (95% CI 1.075–1.093 ) (Table 2 ), which is comparable to estimated for other countries 33 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 54 , 55 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Some studies have provided estimates of the reproduction number using data from several places 14 , 35 – 38 and have observed its link to prevention strategies. Many variants of deterministic and stochastic models have also been developed 4 , 6 , 14 , 17 , 18 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 39 – 43 to predict COVID-19 transmission dynamics, estimate basic reproduction numbers, and examine intervention strategies such as travel ban, lockdown, isolation, and quarantine. While the previous studies have provided important insights into the on-going pandemic, none of these studies focused on epidemic indicators in the context of geographical (open-border) and population contact disparity that exists in places like the provinces of Nepal.…”
Despite the global efforts to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the disease transmission and the effective controls still remain uncertain as the outcome of the epidemic varies from place to place. In this regard, the province-wise data from Nepal provides a unique opportunity to study the effective control strategies. This is because (a) some provinces of Nepal share an open-border with India, resulting in a significantly high inflow of COVID-19 cases from India; (b) despite the inflow of a considerable number of cases, the local spread was quite controlled until mid-June of 2020, presumably due to control policies implemented; and (c) the relaxation of policies caused a rapid surge of the COVID-19 cases, providing a multi-phasic trend of disease dynamics. In this study, we used this unique data set to explore the inter-provincial disparities of the important indicators, such as epidemic trend, epidemic growth rate, and reproduction numbers. Furthermore, we extended our analysis to identify prevention and control policies that are effective in altering these indicators. Our analysis identified a noticeable inter-province variation in the epidemic trend (3 per day to 104 per day linear increase during third surge period), the median daily growth rate (1 to 4% per day exponential growth), the basic reproduction number (0.71 to 1.21), and the effective reproduction number (maximum values ranging from 1.20 to 2.86). Importantly, results from our modeling show that the type and number of control strategies that are effective in altering the indicators vary among provinces, underscoring the need for province-focused strategies along with the national-level strategy in order to ensure the control of a local spread.
“…This pattern of the effective reproduction number identified with our approach is similar to the one computed using dynamical system model 33 . The maintenance of the effective reproduction number below 1 observed in our study due to the policies that control imported cases is consistent with the estimated low reproduction number in other places where inter-cities travel restrictions were imposed 36 , 39 , 41 . Despite a continuous flow of cases from India, one of the most COVID-19 affected countries in the world, the policies implemented by the Nepal government ideally controlled the local transmission, and thus deserve in-depth analysis to identify their local level impacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 ). In line with our finding, the disparity in -trend has also been found in two cities of China where imported cases also contributed to the COVID-19 cases at the beginning of the epidemic 36 . Such wide disparities across provinces found by our study underscores that the analysis of country-level data might not be enough to implement policies for reducing province-level epidemic indicators.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to the number and type of policies, the magnitude of effects of these policies is quite different from province to province (Table 4 ). In general, lockdown appeared to be the most effective policy to control most of the indicators, consistent with previous studies 33 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 43 , although there were some exceptions. Combining all these analyses, our results indicate that the net effect of the policies can be province-dependent despite the policy planning at national level, and thus province-level analysis is critical to proper implementation of government policies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Table 2 , we present the values of basic reproduction number along with their 95% confidence intervals for Nepal and its provinces. We estimated the basic reproduction number for the whole country to be 1.083 (95% CI 1.075–1.093 ) (Table 2 ), which is comparable to estimated for other countries 33 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 54 , 55 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Some studies have provided estimates of the reproduction number using data from several places 14 , 35 – 38 and have observed its link to prevention strategies. Many variants of deterministic and stochastic models have also been developed 4 , 6 , 14 , 17 , 18 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 39 – 43 to predict COVID-19 transmission dynamics, estimate basic reproduction numbers, and examine intervention strategies such as travel ban, lockdown, isolation, and quarantine. While the previous studies have provided important insights into the on-going pandemic, none of these studies focused on epidemic indicators in the context of geographical (open-border) and population contact disparity that exists in places like the provinces of Nepal.…”
Despite the global efforts to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the disease transmission and the effective controls still remain uncertain as the outcome of the epidemic varies from place to place. In this regard, the province-wise data from Nepal provides a unique opportunity to study the effective control strategies. This is because (a) some provinces of Nepal share an open-border with India, resulting in a significantly high inflow of COVID-19 cases from India; (b) despite the inflow of a considerable number of cases, the local spread was quite controlled until mid-June of 2020, presumably due to control policies implemented; and (c) the relaxation of policies caused a rapid surge of the COVID-19 cases, providing a multi-phasic trend of disease dynamics. In this study, we used this unique data set to explore the inter-provincial disparities of the important indicators, such as epidemic trend, epidemic growth rate, and reproduction numbers. Furthermore, we extended our analysis to identify prevention and control policies that are effective in altering these indicators. Our analysis identified a noticeable inter-province variation in the epidemic trend (3 per day to 104 per day linear increase during third surge period), the median daily growth rate (1 to 4% per day exponential growth), the basic reproduction number (0.71 to 1.21), and the effective reproduction number (maximum values ranging from 1.20 to 2.86). Importantly, results from our modeling show that the type and number of control strategies that are effective in altering the indicators vary among provinces, underscoring the need for province-focused strategies along with the national-level strategy in order to ensure the control of a local spread.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.