Transmissibility of anisakid allergenic peptides from animal feed to chicken meat: Proof of concept

Saelens, Ganna; Planckaert, Sören; Devreese, Bart; Gabriël, Sarah

doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104939

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To confirm this hypothesis, a controlled chicken feeding trial using Anisakidae-contaminated feed was conducted. MS/MS-data analysis revealed peptides from 6 different anisakid allergens in the meat and/or blood from the chickens that were fed with Anisakidae-contaminated feed (Saelens et al, 2023).…”

Section: Transfer Of Anisakid Allergens To Meat By Use Of Fishmeal In...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual report of the Scientific Network on Microbiological Risk Assessment 2022

2022

EFSA Supporting Publications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among the tasks of EFSA, according to its founding regulation (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002), there is the establishment of a system of Networks of organisations operating in the fields within EFSA's mission, the objective being to facilitate a scientific cooperation framework by the coordination of activities, the exchange of information, the development and implementation of joint projects, the exchange of expertise and best practices. The Scientific Network on Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA Network) had its first meeting in 2007. Currently, 25 European Union Member States and two observer countries (Switzerland and Norway) are participating in the MRA Network. The 22nd meeting was held on 18‐19 October 2022 as a hybrid‐meeting in Parma and online. A wide range of activities related to microbial risk assessment were presented including impact of Vibrio infections, activities on Campylobacter in broilers, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes, transfer of anisakid allergens to meat, risk assessment of monkey pox transmission through food and risk‐based classification of food establishments as well as an invited presentation on ionophor resistance in poultry. Activities of the EFSA BIOHAZ panel and the BIOHAW Unit were presented.

show abstract

Section: Transfer Of Anisakid Allergens To Meat By Use Of Fishmeal In...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual report of the Scientific Network on Microbiological Risk Assessment 2022

2022

EFSA Supporting Publications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, it was stated that the most frequent cause of an anaphylactic episode due to a hidden allergen, is fish infected with A. simplex [153]. Finally, sufficient proof-of-principle has been provided in the past that demonstrates the transmissibility of anisakid allergenic peptides from fishmeal, as a feed component, to aquacultured fish and chicken meat [154][155][156][157]. These findings may significantly change the importance of these zoonotic nematodes from originally a purely fish borne food risk, to a much wider risk from several food sources (pork meat, chicken meat, aquacultured fish, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foodborne Parasites and Their Complex Life Cycles Challenging Food Safety in Different Food Chains

Gabriël

Dorny

Saelens

et al. 2022

Foods

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zoonotic foodborne parasites often represent complex, multi host life cycles with parasite stages in the hosts, but also in the environment. This manuscript aims to provide an overview of important zoonotic foodborne parasites, with a focus on the different food chains in which parasite stages may occur. We have chosen some examples of meat-borne parasites occurring in livestock (Taenia spp., Trichinella spp. and Toxoplasma gondii), as well as Fasciola spp., an example of a zoonotic parasite of livestock, but transmitted to humans via contaminated vegetables or water, covering the ‘farm to fork’ food chain; and meat-borne parasites occurring in wildlife (Trichinella spp., Toxoplasma gondii), covering the ‘forest to fork’ food chain. Moreover, fish-borne parasites (Clonorchis spp., Opisthorchis spp. and Anisakidae) covering the ‘pond/ocean/freshwater to fork’ food chain are reviewed. The increased popularity of consumption of raw and ready-to-eat meat, fish and vegetables may pose a risk for consumers, since most post-harvest processing measures do not always guarantee the complete removal of parasite stages or their effective inactivation. We also highlight the impact of increasing contact between wildlife, livestock and humans on food safety. Risk based approaches, and diagnostics and control/prevention tackled from an integrated, multipathogen and multidisciplinary point of view should be considered as well.

show abstract