1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01049828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational nonequilibrium effects in shock waves in gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the oligomerization of amino acids by impact shock is mainly controlled by heating at the peak-shocked state, the use of forsterite does not affect the formation of linear peptides as a catalyst. However, as discussed in the former paragraph, chemical reactions are known to be promoted at the shock front (e.g., Greene and Toennies, 1964;Genich et al, 1990;Kulikov, 1999;Velikodnyi and Kurochkin, 2002). Thus, a control experiment (shock experiment at 77 K, without forsterite) to examine the role of forsterite in the reaction at the shock front would be necessary in future research.…”
Section: Peptide Synthesis By Impact Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the oligomerization of amino acids by impact shock is mainly controlled by heating at the peak-shocked state, the use of forsterite does not affect the formation of linear peptides as a catalyst. However, as discussed in the former paragraph, chemical reactions are known to be promoted at the shock front (e.g., Greene and Toennies, 1964;Genich et al, 1990;Kulikov, 1999;Velikodnyi and Kurochkin, 2002). Thus, a control experiment (shock experiment at 77 K, without forsterite) to examine the role of forsterite in the reaction at the shock front would be necessary in future research.…”
Section: Peptide Synthesis By Impact Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this region, the particles are accelerated by the shock wave, causing the pressure and temperature of the material to increase dynamically. The particular effects caused by the non-equilibrium phenomena at the shock front are known to accelerate chemical reactions (e.g., Greene and Toennies, 1964;Genich et al, 1990;Kulikov, 1999;Velikodnyi and Kurochkin, 2002). The difference in the initial conditions (the phase of water and temperature) may have influenced the reaction at the shock front, which then could have caused the difference in the resulting peptides.…”
Section: Peptide Synthesis By Impact Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignition limits of the stoichiometric hydrogen-air mixture behind the incident shock wave obtained in the present work: ○, no ignition; •, there is ignition; 1) approximating curve; 2) Lewis and Elbe curve [1] of ignition in a spherical vessel; 3) and ∆, ignition limits behind the refl ected shock wave [13]. nonequilibrium in the incident shock wave front leading to high-energy collisions (on the scale of several collisions) can also initiate various threshold effects and, in particular, the ignition process [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%