2013
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e3182758035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation of Dose Coefficients From ICRP 53 to ICRP 80

Abstract: The effective dose coefficients tabulated in Publication 80 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for the radiopharmaceuticals addressed earlier in ICRP Publication 53 are based on the tissue weighting factors of ICRP Publication 60. Presumably these values are derived from the tissue dose coefficients tabulated in Publication 53; however, no details regarding their derivation are provided. The tissue weighting factors of Publication 60 explicitly address tissue for which no dose co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the significance of additional doses irradiated from diapers, the estimated diaper-introduced gonadal doses were compared to internal gonadal doses from injected radioactivity. Although standard MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry) provides guidance to calculate organ dose from internal radioisotopes in general population [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], the absorbed fractions of infants differ from those of children and adults, not only in size but also due to the organs of infants being smaller and closer together. Specific anatomical relationship of organs and different radiopharmaceutical biokinetic in infants has to be considered while estimating effective dose and the organ-absorbed dose [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the significance of additional doses irradiated from diapers, the estimated diaper-introduced gonadal doses were compared to internal gonadal doses from injected radioactivity. Although standard MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry) provides guidance to calculate organ dose from internal radioisotopes in general population [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], the absorbed fractions of infants differ from those of children and adults, not only in size but also due to the organs of infants being smaller and closer together. Specific anatomical relationship of organs and different radiopharmaceutical biokinetic in infants has to be considered while estimating effective dose and the organ-absorbed dose [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is incumbent on practitioners of pediatric nuclear medicine to have an understanding of dosimetry and radiation risk to communicate effectively with patients and families. Standard MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry) methods based on ICRP (the International Commission on Radiological Protection) publications provide guidance to calculate organ doses from internal radioisotopes in the general population [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The absorbed fractions of infants differ from those of children and adults, because the organs of infants are smaller and closer together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average 18F-FDG PET effective dose was 6.23 mSv. The CT effective doses varied between 7.22 mSv and 27.3 mSv [12] [13] [14].…”
Section: Radiation-induced Health Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%