2017
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1284905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score

Abstract: The Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score is a reliable and valid measure for assessing patients with shoulder dysfunctions. Implications for Rehabilitation The Turkish version of the Penn shoulder score is valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing patients with shoulder dysfunctions. The Turkish version of the Penn shoulder score could be easily performed by patients and it is easy to score by clinicians. It is recommended to use in clinical settings and in research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Chinese version NPDCC, assessments of reliability and validity, as well as explanatory factor analysis (EFA), were conducted. Item analysis includes critical ratio and correlation analysis: critical ratio test should reach the significance level, indicating the item has sufficient discrimination, and items should be deleted for the Pearson correlation coefficient below 0.60 (11). The internal consistency and half-split reliability analysis were used for reliability analysis: Cronbach's alpha coefficient measuring the average correlation among the items in the scale was considered excellent for above 0.70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Chinese version NPDCC, assessments of reliability and validity, as well as explanatory factor analysis (EFA), were conducted. Item analysis includes critical ratio and correlation analysis: critical ratio test should reach the significance level, indicating the item has sufficient discrimination, and items should be deleted for the Pearson correlation coefficient below 0.60 (11). The internal consistency and half-split reliability analysis were used for reliability analysis: Cronbach's alpha coefficient measuring the average correlation among the items in the scale was considered excellent for above 0.70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct validity of the CISS was tested by correlating total scores of the CISS with total scores of the DASH-T, the pain subscale of the SF-36, and single questions about cold intolerance by using Spearman's ρ correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was accepted as P < 0.05 (27,28). max 65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores of the patients were recorded. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Penn shoulder score was conducted in 2018 by Kanık et al 16 Total ICC score of the questionnaire was shown as 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores of the patients were recorded. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Penn shoulder score was conducted in 2018 by Kanık et al 16 Total ICC score of the questionnaire was shown as 0.90. F I G U R E 1 Measurements of shoulder (A) and cervical (B) angles with a smartphone based photogrammetric program 'Dr Goniometer'.…”
Section: Pain Disability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%