Translation and validation study of the prodromal questionnaire brief version into Indonesian language

Kaligis, Fransiska; Marsubrin, Raden Irawati Ismail; Wiguna, Tjhin; Noorhana, S. W.; Almasyhur, Alfi Fajar

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.012

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The translation and validation of instruments is important given the linguistic and cultural disparities between Indonesia and the West. In the area of child and adolescent mental health, recent work includes translating and validating a prodromal questionnaire, a mother‐infant bonding scale, and a scale for depression and psychological distress (Kaligis, Ismail Marsubrin, Wiguna, Noorhana, & Almasyhur, 2018; Tran et al, 2019; Wiguna & Ismail, 2019). A burnout scale for medical staff and a self‐harm inventory in psychiatric patients were among scales also recently translated (Kusumadewi, Yoga, Sumarni, & Ismanto, 2019; Marlina, Findyartini, & Widiasih, 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The state of psychiatric research in the Asia Pacific region

Roche

Fung

Ransing

et al. 2020

Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction This study aims to review recent scientific publications and research output in the field of psychiatry, from a series of countries in the Asia‐Pacific region (Australia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Lebanon, Malaysia, and Nepal), with a view to identify themes and similarities across regions, as well as to examine the barriers and challenges in mental health research faced by countries in the region. Methods Seven psychiatrists from seven countries reviewed recent published and ongoing research in psychiatry in their respective nations, with respect to themes, as well as any barriers or challenges faced by mental health researchers. Results While the seven nations included in this review vary in terms of research capabilities and economic development level, they share many similarities both in terms of research direction, and with regards to challenges faced. Limitations in the form of sociocultural differences from the West, and a lack of funding were some of the barriers identified. Discussion Mental health research in the region has been progressing well. However, more varied research in the form of qualitative or economic studies are lacking, as are multi‐center studies. The similar issues that nations face with regards to research could perhaps benefit from collaborative efforts and initiatives for the furtherance of research in the region.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The state of psychiatric research in the Asia Pacific region

Roche

Fung

Ransing

et al. 2020

Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is worth noting that during this research, the PQ‐B had the best reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .95; Kline et al, 2015). According to the PQ‐B criteria revised in 2018, the best cut‐off points for the general population of help‐seekers should be ≥7 points in total and ≥ 24 on the distress scale, but recent findings from Indonesia suggested that an even higher lower‐bound of 26 on the distress score might be more appropriate (Kaligis et al, 2018). Taken together, this information leads to the conclusion that despite the efforts which have been made, a single quantitative prognostic criterion may be impossible to determine and a more qualitative approach may be beneficial.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing self‐reported clinical high risk symptoms: The psychometric properties of the polish version of the prodromal questionnaire‐brief and a proposal for an alternative approach to scoring

Starkowska

Tyburski

Kucharska-Mazur

et al. 2020

Early Intervention Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Psychotic‐like experiences (PLEs) might occur in the general population as low‐risk individual differences or prodromal features, requiring quick detection and early intervention. The aims of this study were to conduct a mini‐systematic review of the prognostic abilities of the Prodromal Questionnaire‐Brief (PQ‐B), describe the PLEs distribution for the first time in a Polish population, assess PQ‐B reliability and propose an innovative scoring approach based on cluster analysis. Methods Five hundred and twenty eight (334 female) adult volunteers underwent screening with the PQ‐B, 49% also underwent the early psychosis screening test PRIME, to verify the tests' psychometric properties, to compare the prognostic accuracy of the PQ‐B to the more restrictive PRIME, and to the detected types of possible diagnosis in the general population. Results Almost 70% of respondents met the prognostic criteria of the PQ‐B while only 30.6% met the PRIME criteria. Both tests proved reliable (α > .835) and valid (rho >.710; P < .001). A cluster analysis identified three different sub‐groups detected with the PQ‐B: healthy individuals without PLE; healthy with low‐distressing PLEs; and possibly prodromal subjects reporting less frequent but more distressing PLEs and no worries about their own mental state. Also in systematic reviews, authors of different adaptations have observed that the PQ‐B has too low specificity and postulated the need for higher cut‐offs. Conclusion Study provides evidence of good reliability and sensitivity of the PQ‐B in assessing PLEs among the general population, but emphasizes that straightforward quantitative scoring criteria are still unclear. A more qualitative approach might be useful for differentiating true prodromal subjects from clinically low‐risk individual differences.

show abstract