2014
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the 8‐item Morisky medication adherence scale in myocardial infarction patients

Abstract: The psychometric properties of the C-MMAS-8 are satisfactory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMAS-8 is one of the most commonly used self-report adherence questionnaires. The Chinese version of MMAS-8 has been validated among a convenience sample of 176 patients in China [31]. The scale showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.77) and test-retest reliability ( r  = 0.88), and good construct validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMAS-8 is one of the most commonly used self-report adherence questionnaires. The Chinese version of MMAS-8 has been validated among a convenience sample of 176 patients in China [31]. The scale showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.77) and test-retest reliability ( r  = 0.88), and good construct validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was the first one which translated and validated the 13-item SEAMS into the Taiwanese language. The original SEAMS was tested by Risser et al [26] on coronary heart disease patients and other comorbid conditions patients, and it was found that the scale was reliable with good predictive validity and sensitivity. In our study the analysis indicated that SEAMS-T had good Cronbach alpha (0.931); however, the result is similar to those of study from Risser et al (0.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-MMAS-8 self-report measure is a reliable and valid index that has been used in various people. Cronbach's alpha for this scale is 0.77 [26].…”
Section: Mmas-8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Так, у пациентов, принимающих варфарин, чувствительность, специфичность, поло-жительная и отрицательная прогностическая способность MMAS-8 выявлять пациентов с плохо контролируемым МНО была 73,0%, 35,6%, 49,5% и 60,5%, соответ-ственно [9]. Данный тест продемонстрировал высокий уровень надежности (коэффициент альфа Крон-бах=0,77) при использовании у больных острым ин-фарктом миокарда [10]. При использовании MMAS-8 у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа была выявлена не очень высокая чувствительность 8-вопросной вер-сии: чувствительность, специфичность, положительная и отрицательная прогностическая способность составили 51%, 64%, 71% и 43%, соответственно [11].…”
Section: апробация нового тестаunclassified