2020
DOI: 10.1111/weng.12464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translanguaging, language ontology, and civil rights

Abstract: The author presents a critique of the deconstructivist perspective on translanguaging, which doubts the ontology of discrete speech communities. This paper argues that such a position is inconsistent with a civil rights orientation on language education policy. The paper identifies three aspects of translanguaging -conceptual, pedagogical, and theoretical. It argues that one approach to translanguaging theory, which accepts the deconstructivist perspective on language ontology, is at odds with a civil rights o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While translanguaging is not grounded in social semiotics, it does begin to acknowledge that the two languages that a bilingual child speaks represents one linguistic repertoire for communication. It also seeks to foster the development of bilingual identities and to empower culturally diverse students to use their two languages to act on their own behalf and in pursuit of their benefit (Ascenzi-Moreno, 2018;Cenoz & Gorter, 2017;Collins, 2014;García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017;Hamman, 2018;MacSwan, 2017MacSwan, , 2020Rodríguez, 2015).…”
Section: Bilingual Education Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While translanguaging is not grounded in social semiotics, it does begin to acknowledge that the two languages that a bilingual child speaks represents one linguistic repertoire for communication. It also seeks to foster the development of bilingual identities and to empower culturally diverse students to use their two languages to act on their own behalf and in pursuit of their benefit (Ascenzi-Moreno, 2018;Cenoz & Gorter, 2017;Collins, 2014;García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017;Hamman, 2018;MacSwan, 2017MacSwan, , 2020Rodríguez, 2015).…”
Section: Bilingual Education Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the spoken mode, however, the two linguistic codes were strategically and creatively combined by both the teacher and the students to accomplish a number of functions (e.g., hold the floor, get others' attention, express knowledge, validate, and so on). However spontaneously, this practice closely resembles translanguaging in that it makes room for the students' L1 to surface in interaction and in the interest of learning valuing their pre-exiting knowledge that students have (Ascenzi-Moreno, 2018;Cenoz & Gorter, 2017;García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017;Hamman, 2018;MacSwan, 2017MacSwan, , 2020.…”
Section: íKalamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that mooring language can be a strategic ideological and political tool to recognise minoritised and marginalised languages and varieties in certain places (MacSwan, 2020). In other words, not all acts of mooring are equally negative.…”
Section: Ontologies Of Mooring: Language In National Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%