1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb01298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRANSITORY BLINDNESS DURING ETHANOL AND PHENETHYLBIGUANIDE INDUCED LACTIC ACIDOSIS IN A SUBJECT WITH DIABETES MELLITUS A Case Report

Abstract: Transitory blindness is described in a diabetic patient with typical ethanol- and phenethylbiguanide induced lactic acidosis. The blindness developed in the course of 8 hours, but the vision returned during treatment with iv bicarbonate, insulin and glucose. The condition is discussed in relation to a presumed inhibition of the oxidative metabolism in the retina.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not easy to distinguish between blindness related to MALA and blindness related to other causes. In previous cases, reversible blindness due to lactic acidosis was reported in diabetic patients89); a case of transient blindness due to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and due to alcoholic ketoacidosis have also been reported1011). The common features of these cases were severe metabolic acidosis with pH <7.0 and bicarbonate <5.0mmol/L, and restoration of visual acuity after metabolic acidosis was corrected (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is not easy to distinguish between blindness related to MALA and blindness related to other causes. In previous cases, reversible blindness due to lactic acidosis was reported in diabetic patients89); a case of transient blindness due to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and due to alcoholic ketoacidosis have also been reported1011). The common features of these cases were severe metabolic acidosis with pH <7.0 and bicarbonate <5.0mmol/L, and restoration of visual acuity after metabolic acidosis was corrected (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There was no original report of treating such cases. Three reports were duplications; Thus a 12 case reports, including 4 English and 8 Japanese articles, were analyzed [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%