Transitional Age Youth with Serious Mental Illness: High Acuity Patients Requiring Developmentally Informed Care in the Inpatient Hospital Setting

Deusen, Timothy Van; Wilson, Cynthia L.; Kim, Hyun Jung; Qayyum, Zheala; Millard, Hun; Parke, Susan

doi:10.2174/2210676608666180820153318

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, gender‐based group therapy can be particularly beneficial for females (Mizock & Brubaker, 2020) and transgender persons (Mizock, 2017) with SMI by providing supportive environments to enhance resilience. Developmental‐ or transition‐focused interventions may be necessary for individuals with SMI aged 18 to 25 who may be gaining independence or entering the workforce (Van Deusen et al, 2018), and those aged 50 and older who may be experiencing empty nest syndrome or leaving the workforce (Wister et al, 2016), to facilitate resilience development and maintenance, respectively. Next, clinicians should understand that race/ethnicity can influence resilience.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesResilience, the ability to bounce back from a stressful situation, is a valuable asset for aiding adults with serious mental illness (SMI) in navigating the recovery process. People with SMI experience stress, including traumatic experiences at disproportionate rates. The purposes of this study were to examine the factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) among adults with SMI living in the community.DesignA cross‐sectional survey design was used. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and correlational analyses were employed.MethodsThree hundred fifteen adults with SMI were recruited for two studies (Sample 1, n = 122; Sample 2, n = 193) from three states. All participants completed the BRS along with nearly identical positive psychology‐ and psychopathology‐related measures.ResultsEFA revealed the BRS was unidimensional and explained 61.20% of the variance. Results from seven CFA models suggested a bifactor structure for the BRS, which fit the data best. Internal reliability of the BRS was computed to be within acceptable ranges (α = .87, ω = .90). The BRS was positively correlated with measures of positive coping and life satisfaction, providing convergent validity. Divergent validity was supported by negative correlations between the BRS and measures of psychiatric symptoms, succumbing, and self‐stigma.ConclusionsThe BRS is a valid measure that can be used by clinical and research professionals to assess levels of resilience in adults with SMI at baseline and across time.Practitioner points The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was developed to measure a person’s ability to bounce back from stressful situations. The BRS was examined in adults with serious mental illness living in the community. The BRS presented a bifactor structure measuring resilience (an outcome) and correlated with positive psychology‐ and psychopathology‐related measures. The BRS can be used by practitioners to assess levels of resilience in their clients at baseline and over time to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

show abstract