1995
DOI: 10.1039/ft9959100099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition-metal ion dimers formed in CeO2: an EPR study

Abstract: MeCeO oxides (Me = Cu2+, Mn2+, V4+, Mo5+), with an atomic ratio Me/Ce = 0.1, have been prepared by impregnation of ceria (CeO,) with the corresponding Me salt. Subsequently, the solids were oxidized or reduced at given temperatures. An EPR study evidenced the presence of dimers in the solids. A fine structure was obtained for CuCeO and MoCeO oxides. The signal at half magnetic field intensity (Am, = f2), characteristic of dimers, was present in all the MeCeO oxides with a hyperfine structure for Cu2+, Mn2+ or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since surfaces have higher energies than the bulk, [ 56 ] the g factors have been differentiated between surface and bulk phenomena. Consequently, although g factor for Mo 5+ has been identified, [ 57 ] this can be assigned to the surface since it is not present in the bulk, as shown in Figure 3f. Similarly, there is no g factor for Mo 6+ because this valence does not bond with CeO 2− x .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since surfaces have higher energies than the bulk, [ 56 ] the g factors have been differentiated between surface and bulk phenomena. Consequently, although g factor for Mo 5+ has been identified, [ 57 ] this can be assigned to the surface since it is not present in the bulk, as shown in Figure 3f. Similarly, there is no g factor for Mo 6+ because this valence does not bond with CeO 2− x .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPR detection of Ce 3+ ions in CeO 2 is discussed in many publications and relates mainly to the line with g ∼ 1.96, that is observed at room and up to very high temperatures, which is not typical for rare‐earth ions except S‐state ions. In addition g ∼ 1.96 is rather close to the g value of cubic site position of Ce 3+ in CaF 2 that can be equal to 2 or 3.1 .…”
Section: Epr Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPR signal of the CeO 2 nanostructures with different morphologies are presented in Figure 7. The Ce‐NPs exhibited a large O 2 − signal attributed to the available electrons arising from Ce 3+ ions in lattice positions capable of being transferred to O 2 molecules and O 2 − species are located on surface Ce 4+ ions with both oxygen equidistant from the surface [38] . Ce‐NPs are enclosed by the (111) and (100) crystal planes which are oxygen‐terminated surfaces and could be responsible for the large O 2 EPR signal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ce-NPs exhibited a large O 2 À signal attributed to the available electrons arising from Ce 3 + ions in lattice positions capable of being transferred to O 2 molecules and O 2 À species are located on surface Ce 4 + ions with both oxygen equidistant from the surface. [38] Ce-NPs are enclosed by the (111) and (100) crystal planes which are oxygen-terminated surfaces and could be responsible for the large O 2 EPR signal. As the morphology changes to Ce-NCs, the O 2 signal decreased significantly compared to that of Ce-NPs, while the Ce 3 + EPR signal increased slightly.…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (Epr) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%