Transisi Paradigma Ilmu dan Hukum dalam Konteks Perkembangan Hukum Indonesia

Abstract

Sudjito dan Agus RahardjoRasionalitas ilmu dan hukum modem, yang mangagungkan pn'nsip pasardan prinsip negara, serta mengabaikan prinsip komunitas. takpelak telah menimbulkan berbagai ktisi. Demoralisasi ilmu dan hukum teijadi di seluruh lapisan kehidupan ini. Ilmu dan hukum modem bukan lagi menjadi tempat untuk mendapatkan jawaban atasberbagai problem sosial, tetapijustru menjadi bagian dari problema itu sendiri. Telaah ilmu dan hanya berdasarkan teon berdasarkan teori-teori fisika ala Newton, hanya berlaku pada alam animal saja, dan tidak mampu menjelaskan problema sosial yang terkait dengan manusia yang memilikipikiran dan kesadaran serta hati nurani. Rasionalitas ilmu dan hukum modem itu, sebenarnya merupakan krisis paradigma, dan oleh karenanya hanya bisadiatasi bila iahirparadigma baruyang beriumpu padaelemen-elemen: participation, solidarity danpleasure. Di atas ketiga elemen itulah postmodemisme harus dibangun.Kata Kunci: ilmu hukum, moral, dan Paradigma Santos

The Unsettled Agreement of the 2019 Re-Demarcation of the Indonesia-Malaysia Boundary Line’s Impact

“…In addition to rights and obligations, determining boundaries between countries is vital to guaranteeing jurisdictional clarity and certainty (Prescott & Schofield, 2005). One example of enforcing Indonesian national law, which is still challenging to implement in the disputed area of Sebatik Island, is the agrarian law, which is a means to anticipate the emergence of various conflicts over ownership and control (Sudjito, 2018). Even though Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to the principle of using the property of the right, the 2019 re-demarcation emphasized that Indonesia and Malaysia, as two sovereign countries, have the right to redefine their boundaries.…”

“…Within the framework of national law, the most appropriate is agrarian law, which regulates land. National agrarian law is a means to anticipate the emergence of various conflicts of ownership and control (Sudjito, 2018). This agrarian law regulates land ownership and the management of natural resources in the border area.…”

“…Land use in the disputed area is in the form of land for gardening and buildings used as residences. Furthermore, Sudjito (2017) states that according to the 1960 Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) conception, "a person uses land, of course, using the body of the earth and the space on it following the intended use. "…”

“…The aim of agrarian reform in the disputed area is to realize justice and welfare for the people of Sebatik Island. In other words, according to Sudjito (2018), agrarian reform must be successful if it takes a holistic approach that integrates the integrity of the law, society, nature, culture, power, politics, economy, and aspects of human life.…”

Moral Position In Legal Science: An Analysis of The Dynamics of Legal Science Development

“…5 An institution in the pursuit of truth, legal science continues to evolve but the development is not linear. The comprehensive scale is aimed at absolute truth and justice, 6 where legal science is related to existing and designed laws. 7 According to Durkheim, legal principle represents societal moral, depicting the embodiment of solidarity and togetherness 8 to regulate individuals in society.…”