2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3046789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Roebel Bar Force Calculation in Large Salient-Pole Synchronous Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the CSSIM always has a higher error than the DSSIM with a peak value at 8.5% on currents, meaning over 17% on losses. In the context of high competition towards efficiency increase and reduction of measurement tolerances on efficiencies in hydro-generators 1 , there is a strong need for more precise computation methods and the DSSIM clearly responds to this need.…”
Section: B Dssim Vs Cssimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison, the CSSIM always has a higher error than the DSSIM with a peak value at 8.5% on currents, meaning over 17% on losses. In the context of high competition towards efficiency increase and reduction of measurement tolerances on efficiencies in hydro-generators 1 , there is a strong need for more precise computation methods and the DSSIM clearly responds to this need.…”
Section: B Dssim Vs Cssimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus only, the saturation component is missing with respect to the DSSIM. As it can be seen, the DSSIM has here also a significantly 1 In today's tender, the IEC tolerance does not apply anymore. The clients are only accepting a reduced tolerance of about 2-3%.…”
Section: B Dssim Vs Cssimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation