1994
DOI: 10.1109/40.259897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient fault tolerance in digital systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume a combination of hardware-based (e.g., watchdogs, signature checking) and software-based error detection methods, systematically applicable without any knowledge of the application (i.e., no reasonableness and range checks) [20]. The error detection overhead is considered as part of the process worst-case execution time.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume a combination of hardware-based (e.g., watchdogs, signature checking) and software-based error detection methods, systematically applicable without any knowledge of the application (i.e., no reasonableness and range checks) [20]. The error detection overhead is considered as part of the process worst-case execution time.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous shrinking of transistor sizes, modern devices are becoming more susceptible to faults [21,9]. Such faults can be roughly categorized as permanent or transient ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in [160] there are important benefits for the Mission Time Degradation and Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) Degradation associated to correctly discriminating transient from permanent faults. It is clear that no equal treatment has to be given to both of them.…”
Section: B23 Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%