2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2006.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming OWL-S Process Model into EDFA for Service Discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, there are matching approaches that use sequential automata [44], [45], [46], [47] or Petri nets [48] to formalize behavioral aspects of web services. However, in the context of BPEL and OWL-S, the translation of constructs exhibiting parallelism leads to a state explosion, because the cartesian product of all parallel branches has to be constructed.…”
Section: Process Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, there are matching approaches that use sequential automata [44], [45], [46], [47] or Petri nets [48] to formalize behavioral aspects of web services. However, in the context of BPEL and OWL-S, the translation of constructs exhibiting parallelism leads to a state explosion, because the cartesian product of all parallel branches has to be constructed.…”
Section: Process Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches in related work support only one type of matching and focus either on syntactic similarity of BPEL processes [11], [13], or are not efficient in the context of BPEL [45], [46], [47], [48]. Another contribution of this paper is an analysis of the interplay between the construction and matching of process views.…”
Section: Process Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%