2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformational, Transactional, and Passive-Avoidant Leadership Characteristics of a Surgical Resident Cohort: Analysis Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire and Implications for Improving Surgical Education Curriculums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, instruments or tools, whose development is based on different leadership theories/models/styles, can be applied to evaluate leadership. The most abundant theoretical framework in the investigated manuscripts was transformational leadership: more than half the papers addressed this model (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(56)(57)(58) , which corroborates other studies (59)(60)(61)(62) . Transformational leadership is wide, visionary and charismatic, characteristics that made it one of the most popular in the present days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, instruments or tools, whose development is based on different leadership theories/models/styles, can be applied to evaluate leadership. The most abundant theoretical framework in the investigated manuscripts was transformational leadership: more than half the papers addressed this model (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(56)(57)(58) , which corroborates other studies (59)(60)(61)(62) . Transformational leadership is wide, visionary and charismatic, characteristics that made it one of the most popular in the present days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…in general, four with nurses and nursing technicians and a few described investigations with a mix of nurses and other professionals. Nineteen instruments were identified to evaluate leadership: Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) (five papers) (51)(52)(53)(54)(55) ; Charismatic Leadership Socialized Scale (one paper) (39) ; Clinical Leadership Survey (CLS) (one paper) (25) ; the Coaching tool (two papers) (41)(42) ; Scale of attitudes toward leadership styles (one paper) (33) ; the 360º tool (one paper) (40) ; Global Transformational Leadership Scale (three papers) (56)(57)(58) ; Grid Gerencial (one paper) (43) ; Leadership Effectiveness and Adaptability Description (LEAD) (two papers) (49)(50) ; LMX-Leader-member Exchange (two papers) (46)(47) ; Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) (six papers) (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) ; Leadership Reward and Punishment Behavior Questionnaire (LRPQ) (one paper) (33) ; Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (eleven papers) (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) ; Multisource Feedback Tool (MSF) (one paper) (44) ; the Quantum tool (one paper) (38) ; Servant Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ) (one paper) (48) ; Servant Leadership Survey (SLS) (two papers) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The literature on leadership in medical settings is considerably smaller. Some studies 7,8 have looked at physician executives; a few, 9 at surgical leadership. Researchers agree that physician leadership largely is understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%