“…In both complexes 3 and 4 , the Si1–M–Si2 angle decreases in the order Cu < Au < Ag [ 3 Cu (168.34(2)°) < 3 Au (165.75(6)°) < 3 Ag (164.23(11)°); 4 Cu (175.93(4)°) < 4 Au (172.886(19)°) < 4 Ag (171.544(16)°)]. In all complexes 3 and 4 , the Si1(silylene)–M and Si2(chlorosilyl)–M distances are comparable to or slightly longer than the previously reported silylene–M bond lengths [M = Cu (2.172–2.295 Å), ,,,,,,,, Ag (2.322–2.424 Å), ,,,, Au (2.242–2.318 Å) ,,, ] and neutral silyl–M(I) bond lengths [M = Cu (2.211–2.363 Å), Ag (2.383–2.424 Å), , Au (2.344–2.362 Å) , ]. The Si1(silylene)–M distances of CDASi-ligated complexes 3 Ag [2.4098(19) Å] and 3 Au [2.3297(16) Å] are shorter than those of CAASi-ligated complexes 4 Ag [2.4296(5) Å] and 4 Au [2.3512(6) Å], respectively, despite the larger steric demand of CDASi 1 than CAASi 2 [the percent buried volume (% V bur ): 38.2% for 1 and 35.4% for 2 ] .…”