2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of soil contaminants to home-produced eggs and preventive measures to reduce contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the absence of specific measurements, it is likely that a part of the ingested soil corresponded to indirect ingestion along with small animals like earthworms or deposited on plant particles as dust. Variations in soil intake between flocks illustrated the effect of plant cover, which acts as a 'buffer' between the birds and the soil (Supplementary Material S1 and S2), as previously suggested by Schuler et al (1997) and by Waegeneers et al (2009) in laying hens. Indeed, flocks exploring yards with a good plant cover in spring -that is, flocks 1 or 4 -ingested very little soil; however, during winter (i.e.…”
Section: Intakes and Their Variation Factorssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Despite the absence of specific measurements, it is likely that a part of the ingested soil corresponded to indirect ingestion along with small animals like earthworms or deposited on plant particles as dust. Variations in soil intake between flocks illustrated the effect of plant cover, which acts as a 'buffer' between the birds and the soil (Supplementary Material S1 and S2), as previously suggested by Schuler et al (1997) and by Waegeneers et al (2009) in laying hens. Indeed, flocks exploring yards with a good plant cover in spring -that is, flocks 1 or 4 -ingested very little soil; however, during winter (i.e.…”
Section: Intakes and Their Variation Factorssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The direct intake of PFOS from contaminated water in farmed animals has been calculated considering the recommended water supply to satisfy animal welfare parameters (Rossi and Gastaldo, 2005). Estimates of top soil intake for the free-range livestock were derived from the European Food Safety Authority opinion (EFSA, 2011) on persistent organic pollutants intake in small ruminants (6% of the dry matter intake from forages), from Edwards (2003) for pigs (20%), and from Waegeneers et al (2009) for poultry flocks (50%), as consequence of animals grazing behavior on amended pastures and soils (Table 1). To this purpose, expected concentration of PFOS in sludges from WWTPs have been derived using the accumulation factor with respect to that in water influents (Â3050) as reported by Yu et al (2009).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21−24 Organic contaminants in eggs may be derived from the contaminated chicken feed, herbs, and soil. 23,24 The transfer kinetics of α-HBCD and γ-HBCD from chicken diet to chicken tissues and eggs were only assessed in laboratory studies. 20,25 Dominguez-Romero et al 25 reported that the steady-state accumulation ratios (ARs, defined as HBCD concentrations (ng/g lipid weight) in tissue to HBCD concentrations (ng/g fresh weight) in diet) were 5.2, 3.6, and 9.2 for α-HBCD in egg yolk, chicken liver, and chicken abdominal fat, respectively, and the steady-state carry-over rate (COR), expressed as the daily excretion of HBCD (ng) via eggs to daily intake of HBCDs (ng) from diet, was 22.9%.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%