2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-0158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transducer Installation Effects on Pressure Measurements in PGC Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accounts for the precision and bias uncertainty of the measured pressure, but it does not include possible amplification or attenuation of the measured peak pressure due to the installation of the pressure transducer in a recessed cavity port. 44,45 As reported in Table 1, for Case A-1, the resulting ppp/pc is 124%, while for Case B-2, the ppp/pc is 5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This accounts for the precision and bias uncertainty of the measured pressure, but it does not include possible amplification or attenuation of the measured peak pressure due to the installation of the pressure transducer in a recessed cavity port. 44,45 As reported in Table 1, for Case A-1, the resulting ppp/pc is 124%, while for Case B-2, the ppp/pc is 5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…All HF transducers are installed in a recessed cavity with a port resonance greater than 10 kHz and sampled at 180 kHz. 44,45 OH* and CH* are commonly used as qualitative markers of global heat release in combustion diagnostics. For the purposes of this work, the change in chemiluminescence intensity is assumed to be proportional to the heat release rate from the flame.…”
Section: Operation and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A calibration test bed based on a hydrogen-oxygen predetonator for a pulsed detonation engine (PDE) as a source for the steep fronted pressure wave is designed in Ref. 24 to enable characterization of pressure sensors installed in the flush, receiver, and waveguide tube configuration. The sensor with the receiver of approximate volume V ≈ 44 mm 3 showed up to 28% amplitude attenuation and almost negligible time lag compared to the flush sensor, and the sensor installed in the waveguide tube with d ¼ 3.2 mm and L = 100 mm showed a significantly higher delay and as much as 54% reduction in the measured attenuated pressure amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What would be the measurement accuracy of the local instantaneous and timeaveraged static pressure in an RDE combustor when using a remote pressure sensor with the waveguide tubereceiver system and with a waveguide tube of relatively large diameter (on the order of several millimeters, like in Refs. 19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]? What would be the effect of such a measurement system on the frequency spectrum of the pressure signal?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%