2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TransDose: a transformer-based UNet model for fast and accurate dose calculation for MR-LINACs

Abstract: Objective: To present a transformer-based UNet model (TransDose) for fast and accurate dose calculation for magnetic resonance-linear accelerators (MR-LINACs). Approach: A 2D fluence map from each beam was first projected into a 3D fluence volume and then fed into the TransDose model together with patient density volume and output predicted beam dose. The proposed TransDose model combined a 3D residual UNet with a transformer encoder, where convolutional layers extracted the volumetric spatial features, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, iDoTA achieves higher gamma pass rates than all previous convolutional models, also compared to the purely convolutional iDoTA-conv variant trained with identical dataset, training procedure and architecture (except for the transformer encoder). As in previous proton studies 39 and the concurrent TransDose, 40 these findings demonstrate that the addition of the transformer-being able to capture relationships between distant features, as opposed to convolutions-seems to be beneficial for dose prediction tasks. Moreover, our method outperforms the concurrent TransDose transformer model in both accuracy and speed.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, iDoTA achieves higher gamma pass rates than all previous convolutional models, also compared to the purely convolutional iDoTA-conv variant trained with identical dataset, training procedure and architecture (except for the transformer encoder). As in previous proton studies 39 and the concurrent TransDose, 40 these findings demonstrate that the addition of the transformer-being able to capture relationships between distant features, as opposed to convolutions-seems to be beneficial for dose prediction tasks. Moreover, our method outperforms the concurrent TransDose transformer model in both accuracy and speed.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Modelssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…All prediction times for all models include the time needed to generate and prepare the inputs, predict the output and (for full dose distributions) accumulate beam doses. For individual beam prediction, iDoTA is significantly faster than any other competitor, being 30–60x faster than the 3D U‐net models and 6x faster than the concurrent transformer model TransDose 40 . Likewise, iDoTA predicts full dose distribution from VMAT plans (with 194–354 beams per plan) on average in 8 s, representing a 10–80x speed‐up compared to the IMRT (with ≈ 10 beams) U‐net models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plans available, we compare the Γ(1 mm, 1%), Γ(2 mm, 2%) and Γ(3 mm, 3%) gamma pass rate to the values reported in previous studies. In particular, iDoTA's accuracy and inference times are compared to those of: convolutional U-net architectures predicting each beam in the plan individually [30,31]; convolutional models de-noising MC dose distributions [24,23]; and a concurrent 3D U-net and transformer model for MR-Linac dose prediction [39].…”
Section: Full Dose Distributions For 11 Additional Patients Outside T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All prediction times for all models include the time needed to generate and prepare the inputs, predict the output and (for full dose distributions) accumulate beam doses. For individual beam prediction, iDoTA is significantly faster than any other competitor, being 30-60x faster than the 3D U-net models and 6x faster than the concurrent transformer model TransDose [39]. Likewise, iDoTA predicts full dose distribution from VMAT plans (with 194-354 beams per plan) on average in 8 seconds, representing a 10-80x speed-up compared to the IMRT (with ≈ 10 beams) U-net models.…”
Section: Model Average Time [S]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation