2010
DOI: 10.1159/000319900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcutaneous Cervical and Transabdominal Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Tool in Gastroesophageal Reflux in Childhood

Abstract: Background/Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate if there is a diagnostic expressive difference in the angle of His, upper and lower esophageal diameter (UED and LED), wall thickness of cervical esophagus (WTCE) measured by cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) between children with (+) and without gastroesophageal reflux (GER–). Methods: 50 children were separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was the control group (n = 30) consisting of children who had no symptoms of GER and had no GER detected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Karabulut et al 8 showed increases in the upper and lower esophageal diameters and wall thickness of the cervical esophagus on cervical and transabdominal sonography in gastroesophageal reflux. In addition, case reports related to foreign bodies and achalasia in evaluation of the cervical esophagus have been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Karabulut et al 8 showed increases in the upper and lower esophageal diameters and wall thickness of the cervical esophagus on cervical and transabdominal sonography in gastroesophageal reflux. In addition, case reports related to foreign bodies and achalasia in evaluation of the cervical esophagus have been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8). No significant age-or sex-dependent differences in the gastroesophageal angle have been reported [46].…”
Section: Us and Morphological Informationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The proximal and distal esophageal diameters have also been recently evaluated sonographically by Karabulut et al [46], who found no difference between boys and girls.…”
Section: Us and Morphological Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations