2012
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcript and metabolite signature of maize source leaves suggests a link between transitory starch to sucrose balance and the autonomous floral transition

Abstract: Little is known about the nature of floral inductive cues in day-neutral plants that are insensitive to photoperiod variations and, therefore, rely on endogenous signals to initiate reproductive growth. The INDETERMINATE1 (ID1) transcription factor is a key regulator of the transition to flowering in day-neutral maize. The ID1 gene is expressed exclusively in developing leaves, where it controls the production or transmission of leaf-derived florigenic signals. Florigen-producing source … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in their expression during the floral transition in various maize lines indicate that the gene regulatory network controlling FTi in maize is very complex and not universal in all lines. Studies that aimed to identify, for example, targets of the leaf-restricted TF ID1 regulating the transition to flowering support this assumption, as the identified up-and down-regulated genes (Coneva et al, 2007(Coneva et al, , 2012 do not overlap with the genes found in this study. Thus, we conclude that, during adaption to a range of climates, maize lines have evolved distinct severities of the roles of different floral control key players.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Differences in their expression during the floral transition in various maize lines indicate that the gene regulatory network controlling FTi in maize is very complex and not universal in all lines. Studies that aimed to identify, for example, targets of the leaf-restricted TF ID1 regulating the transition to flowering support this assumption, as the identified up-and down-regulated genes (Coneva et al, 2007(Coneva et al, , 2012 do not overlap with the genes found in this study. Thus, we conclude that, during adaption to a range of climates, maize lines have evolved distinct severities of the roles of different floral control key players.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We previously showed that this night break (NB) regimen effectively prevents flowering in teosinte without greatly altering the total amount of light received by nonflowering plants relative to those grown under SD conditions ( Fig. 1; Lazakis et al, 2011;Coneva et al, 2012).…”
Section: Gene Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, id1 acts as a gatekeeper that primes floral induction in day-neutral temperate maize. Previous transcriptome comparisons of flowering and nonflowering maize suggest that id1 also regulates genes involved in primary metabolism to establish a physiological state associated with readiness for flowering (Coneva et al, 2007(Coneva et al, , 2012, thus connecting florigen production with metabolic rate to facilitate the transition to reproductive growth.…”
Section: Variation Of Zcn7 and Zcn8 Transcript Isoform Levels Under Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors demonstrated that the INDETERMINATE DOMAIN 8 (IDD8) transcription factor plays a role in FT-dependent flowering induction, via modulation of the SuSy4 activity. Further, Coneva et al (2012) reported that the starch to sucrose transition is important during autonomous flowering. In conclusion, sucrose seems to interact in many ways with the flowering network, and further studies are needed to fully understand these connections at the molecular level.…”
Section: How Do Sugar Signals Interact With Flowering Network?mentioning
confidence: 99%