2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of schizophrenic symptoms: A double blind sham controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, three recent studies 9-11 using a double-blind, sham-controlled design have given inconsistent results. Significant improvement noticed by Hoffman et al, 9 using 1 Hz rTMS, was not replicated by Fitzgerald et al 10 and Saba et al, 11 who failed to find such differences in their studies. Considering the fact that successful rTMS of schizophrenia may be linked to stimulation frequency and symptom profile, there is a need for further studies to investigate the suitability and efficacy of 10 Hz, suprathreshold rTMS on schizophrenic negative symptoms with a parallel design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, three recent studies 9-11 using a double-blind, sham-controlled design have given inconsistent results. Significant improvement noticed by Hoffman et al, 9 using 1 Hz rTMS, was not replicated by Fitzgerald et al 10 and Saba et al, 11 who failed to find such differences in their studies. Considering the fact that successful rTMS of schizophrenia may be linked to stimulation frequency and symptom profile, there is a need for further studies to investigate the suitability and efficacy of 10 Hz, suprathreshold rTMS on schizophrenic negative symptoms with a parallel design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These promising results were replicated with an extended duration of stimulation for 2 weeks [17] and with a higher intensity of magnetic field [18][19][20][21] . Conversely, the effect was not replicated by studies with a treatment period only up to 5 days [22,23] or when the magnetic field was administered in the subthreshold intensity [24,25] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…123 After exclusion of this study, the difference between active and sham rTMS increased (Cohen d = 0.88). In the 2 studies not included in the meta-analysis, one had insufficient data to calculate an effect size 124 and the other had not yet been published. 125 Rosa and colleagues treated 11 people with schizophrenia on clozapine with refractory auditory hallucinations over 10 days with low frequency rTMS or sham treatment.…”
Section: Rtms For the Treatment Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%