2007
DOI: 10.1159/000106055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Low-Frequency rTMS on Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) and Regional Brain Metabolism (PET) in Schizophrenia Patients with Auditory Hallucinations

Abstract: Background: Auditory hallucinations are characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia with high clinical importance. It was repeatedly reported that low frequency (≤1Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) diminishes treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations. A neuroimaging study elucidating the effect of rTMS in auditory hallucinations has yet to be published. Objective: To evaluate the distribution of neuronal electrical activity and the brain metabolism changes after low-frequency rTMS in patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The omnibus null hypothesis of no activation anywhere in the brain was rejected if at least 1 t value (i.e. voxel, t MAX ) was above the critical threshold for p = 0.05, determined by 5,000 randomizations [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The omnibus null hypothesis of no activation anywhere in the brain was rejected if at least 1 t value (i.e. voxel, t MAX ) was above the critical threshold for p = 0.05, determined by 5,000 randomizations [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LORETA inverse solution is based on the assumption that synchronized discharge is required for generating cortical EEG rhythms, an assumption that has been consolidated in numerous intracerebral studies (Buzsáki et al 2012). LORETA has been applied in almost thousand peerreview publication (Thatcher et al 2012) and has received considerable cross-modal validation from several studies combining LORETA with more established localizing methods such as functional MRI (Vitacco et al 2002;Mulert et al 2004;Mulert et al 2005;Olbrich et al 2009;Neuner et al 2014), structural MRI (Worrell et al 2000;Babiloni et al 2011;Babiloni et al 2013;Vecchio et al, 2015), diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (Thatcher et al 2012), or positron emission tomography (Pizzagalli et al 2004;Horacek et al 2007). We apply eLORETA, which has no localization bias even in the presence of structured noise ) and, therefore, was found to have a slightly increase localization performance compared to the previous version, called sLORETA (Jatoi et al 2014).…”
Section: Current Source Density Of Neuronal Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Then, in contrast, another study reported a much larger effect size of 1.04 for 1 Hz rTMS in patients with AVH. 8 This study included 2 open-label trials in which the clinical evaluators were aware of the treatment delivered to each patient and for which the large positive effects 9,10 could bias the results and may explain the difference. Slotema et al produced 2 meta-analyses with effect sizes of 0.54 11 and 0.44.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%