Transcending the power of hierarchy to facilitate shared leadership

Abstract

Purpose -Although communal forms of leadership are being called for to provide contemporary organizations with more responsive leadership platforms, the paper can find no compelling description as to how such leadership might develop in a world of hierarchy. The purpose of this paper is to fill this void. Design/methodology/approach -Attempting to comprehend the sharing of leadership will require contemplation of unconventional approaches in opposition to the dominant logic associated with conventional organizational leadership. One current example of such unorthodox deliberation is the emerging awareness of the Grateful Dead's influence on business management and leadership. Accordingly, the paper examined and interpreted the experiences and expressed beliefs of Jerry Garcia of the Grateful Dead to offer a conceptualization of how shared leadership could emerge in traditional organizational settings. Findings -The analysis indicates that Jerry Garcia exhibited aspects of transformational leadership, servant leadership, and authentic leadership that allowed him to influence the environment needed for the emergence of shared leadership. Research limitations/implications -As a single case study, the primary limitation is one of generalizability. The paper accepts the trade-off, however, due to the significant conceptual insights available with a case methodology. Practical implications -Without greater understanding of how shared leadership might unfold practitioners will assume the construct of shared leadership is laudable but naïve. The paper must begin developing plausible conceptualizations if the notion of sharing leadership is to be taken more seriously in organizations. Originality/value -The paper offers a counterintuitive, counterculture conceptualization of how shared leadership could emerge and flourish in traditional hierarchical settings. Keywords Hierarchy, Jerry Garcia, Shared leadership Paper type Conceptual paper This report shows how we really work. We do business the way artists do business. The reason there is a Grateful Dead Productions is because the State of California requires that we identify ourselves as a business. [y] Grateful Dead Productions, Inc. is a legal fiction, not a working reality. It doesn't represent our real work. Just because we have an office doesn't mean we have to feel we have to be office workers, nor identify ourselves as a Corporation because we have a corporation.The reason for the attempt to describe ourselves is to free all the people in our organization from having to feel defined by what is actually an externally dictated fiction of convenience.[y] ( Jerry Garcia).

Darzi Clinical Leadership Fellows: an activity theory perspective

“…Thus, the fellows are internalising their own mix of leadership styles to managerial and leadership challenges and power structures. Their application reflects the power dynamics that underpin this practice (Barnes et al , 2013). The analysis also drew insights into strategic project leadership (Shenhar, 2012), and how the fellows are helping to facilitate sustainability of London NHS through change processes in their respective organisations.…”

Job characteristics affect shared leadership

“…Evidently, it is increasingly becoming a preferred mode of leadership in team-based structures as it involves diverse range of perspectives to perform challenging work (Fletcher and Kaufer, 2003). Research indicates that displaying shared leadership is associated with high performance and creativity in teams over the teams dominated by a single leader (Wu and Chen, 2018; Hoch and Dulebohn, 2017; Barnes et al , 2013; Ensley et al , 2006; Pearce et al , 2004).…”

The Effect of Organizational Structure on Leader Power in Educational and Security Organizations: A Comparative Study

“…Liderlik ve örgüt alanındaki yapılan çalışmalar listelendiğinde, lider gücünün önemli çalışma konularından biri olduğu görülmektedir. Liderlik, hiyerarşik güçten daha karmaşıktır (Barnes, Humphreys, Oyler, Haden ve Novicevic, 2013). Lider davranışının temelinde yer alan güç (Yukl, 2002), yöneticiler ve astlar arasındaki ilişkide kullanılan güç taktiklerine yönelik bir anlayış sağlamaktadır (Schwarzwald, Koslowsky ve Ochana-Levin, 2004).…”