2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve and Valve-in-Ring for Treating Aortic and Mitral Surgical Prosthetic Dysfunction

Abstract: Bioprosthetic valve use has increased significantly. Considering their limited durability, there will remain an ongoing clinical need for repairing or replacing these prostheses in the future. The current standard of care for treating bioprosthetic valve degeneration involves redo open-heart surgery. However, repeat cardiac surgery may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the rapid evolution of transcatheter heart valve therapies, the feasibility and safety of implanting a transcatheter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
96
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (http://riskcalc.sts.org/de.aspx) and/or the Logistic EuroSCORE (http://www.euroscore.org/calcold.html) were used to predict operative mortality in the event of conventional SAVR for each patient undergoing TAVI or V-in-V. Internal diameters of previously implanted surgical valves were provided by each site and were derived from their respective labels and manufacturing charts 11. Aortic annular measurements were obtained from 3D CT exams and valve sizing was based on manufacturer recommendations and the Valve in Valve app (for V-in-V procedures).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (http://riskcalc.sts.org/de.aspx) and/or the Logistic EuroSCORE (http://www.euroscore.org/calcold.html) were used to predict operative mortality in the event of conventional SAVR for each patient undergoing TAVI or V-in-V. Internal diameters of previously implanted surgical valves were provided by each site and were derived from their respective labels and manufacturing charts 11. Aortic annular measurements were obtained from 3D CT exams and valve sizing was based on manufacturer recommendations and the Valve in Valve app (for V-in-V procedures).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean mortality rate at one year was 15.1%. Factors associated with increased mortality were smaller surgical valves, stenotic dysfunction and transapical approach [42].…”
Section: Vale-in-valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has not been limited to the use of surgical prostheses, and it has also been described following transcatheter mitral procedures with nondedicated devices. The reported rate of acute LVOT obstruction with transcatheter mitral valve-in-ring procedures is 8.2% (14), and it increases up to 9.3% following TMVR in the presence of severe mitral annular calcification (13). Multiple factors should be evaluated when determining the risk of LVOT obstruction after TMVR (22,23): the aortomitralannular angle, which is the angle between the annular planes of these 2 valves (if the angle is obtuse, there may be a higher risk of obstruction, as the struts of the prosthesis will encroach on the LVOT); degree of septal hypertrophy; left ventricle size; and device protrusion and flaring into the LVOT.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%