2010
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
142
2
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(35 reference statements)
11
142
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Another study also measured the coronal and sagittal diameter of the aortic annulus on MDCT and found that MDCT-derived diameters were significantly larger than diameters measured on echocardiography. 12 On further analysis, it was also apparent that patients with low LV EF had a significantly higher LVOT diameter on TTE, probably reflecting changes concomitant with LV remodeling. These patients also had a lower LVOT VTI , as would be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Another study also measured the coronal and sagittal diameter of the aortic annulus on MDCT and found that MDCT-derived diameters were significantly larger than diameters measured on echocardiography. 12 On further analysis, it was also apparent that patients with low LV EF had a significantly higher LVOT diameter on TTE, probably reflecting changes concomitant with LV remodeling. These patients also had a lower LVOT VTI , as would be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4 -8 Previous studies have also demonstrated that TTE underestimates AVA compared with MDCT, cardiac magnetic resonance, transesophageal echocardiography, Gorlin formula, and even surgical sizers. 8,12,[17][18][19][20] One study compared AVA from planimetry on MDCT to AVA calculated using traditional TTE and found good concordance between the 2 measurements with small underestimation of area by TTE. 18 A previous report has also demonstrated good concordance between TTE-AVA and AVA p on MDCT, with a tendency for underestimation of AVA by TTE (similar to the current study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the valve prosthesis was selected on the basis of aortic annulus measurements obtained by TEE (first 25 patients) or by a combination of TEE and computed tomography (CT) (last 86 patients). Valve sizes of 23,26, and 29 mm were selected for aortic annuli between 18 and 21 mm, 22 and 24 mm, and 25 and 27 mm, respectively. Full balloon inflation lasted for at least three seconds during valve implantation.…”
Section: Methods Study Population and Tavi Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, patients with larger recoil had a tendency to a greater Agatston calcium score in the analysis, and it is well known that the amount of valve calcification is an important predictor of significant aortic regurgitation with self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves [24][25][26] . The impact of valve calcification on the degree of recoil and paravalvular regurgitation needs to be addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Valve Haemodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1,2 Although outcomes following TAVI have improved through developments in technology and increasing clinical experience, postprocedural aortic regurgitation remains relatively common and an important issue as it has been identified as an independent predictor of mortality. [3][4][5] Incongruence between device size and aortic annulus dimensions, 6,7 extensive calcification of the aortic valve [8][9][10] and prosthesis malposition [11][12][13] are considered the main causes of this phenomenon. Trivial or mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation is actually frequent, 6,[14][15][16] whereas moderate-to-severe is relatively rare, but it may be associated with increased mortality between 30 days and 1 year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%