2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10617-006-9586-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaction-level modeling for architectural and power analysis of PowerPC and CoreConnect-based systems

Abstract: Transaction-Level models have emerged as an efficient way of modeling systemson-chip, with acceptable simulation speed and modeling accuracy. Nevertheless, the high complexity of current architectures and bus protocols make it very challenging to develop and verify such models. This paper presents the transaction-level models developed at IBM for PowerPC and CoreConnect-based systems. These models can be simulated in a SystemC environment for functional verification and power estimation. Detailed transactionba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dhanwada et al (Narayanan et al, 2005;Dhanwada et al, 2005) proposed a generic flow for power estimation at the SystemC level ( Figure 4). The output of circuit simulation is a multi-level tree (called HTLP tree), where the granularity of the transaction gradually increases as we move towards the root, from power consumption values for primitive transactions, to a complex sequence of actions.…”
Section: Api Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhanwada et al (Narayanan et al, 2005;Dhanwada et al, 2005) proposed a generic flow for power estimation at the SystemC level ( Figure 4). The output of circuit simulation is a multi-level tree (called HTLP tree), where the granularity of the transaction gradually increases as we move towards the root, from power consumption values for primitive transactions, to a complex sequence of actions.…”
Section: Api Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach for recent processors and systems is not realistic. Dhawada et al [5] proposed a power estimation methodology for a monoprocessor PowerPC and CoreConnect-based system at the TLM level. Their power modeling methodology is based on a fine-grain activity characterization at the gate level, which needs a huge amount of development time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach for recent processors and systems is not realistic. Dhawada et al [5] proposed a power estimation methodology for a monoprocessor PowerPC and CoreConnect-based system at the TLM level. Their power modeling methodology is based on a fine-gsrain activity characterization at the gate level, which needs a huge amount of development time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%